Huwentoxin IV (HwTx-IV) is a neurotoxin that was originally isolated from Haplopelma schmidti (Chinese bird spider). This lethal neurotoxin acts selectively on tetrodotoxin-sensitive (TTX-S) voltage-gated sodium channels, with an IC50 of 30 nM in rat DRG neurons. It preferentially inhibits neuronal voltage-gated sodium channel subtype hNav1.7 (SCN9A, IC50 is 26 nM), rNav1.2 (SCN2A, IC50 is 150 nM), and rNav1.3 (SCN3A, IC50 is 338 nM), compared with muscle subtypes rNav1.4 (SCN4A) and hNav1.5 (SCN5A) (IC50 is > 10 µM). Huwentoxin IV inhibits the activation of sodium channels by trapping the voltage sensor of domain II of the site 4 in the inward, closed configuration.
Description:
AA sequence: Glu-Cys2-Leu-Glu-Ile-Phe-Lys-Ala-Cys9-Asn-Pro-Ser-Asn-Asp-Gln-Cys16-Cys17-Lys-Ser-Ser-Lys-Leu-Val-Cys24-Ser-Arg-Lys-Thr-Arg-Trp-Cys31-Lys-Tyr-Gln-Ile-NH2
Disulfide bonds: Cys2-Cys17, Cys9-Cys24 and Cys16-Cys31
Length (aa): 35
Formula: C174H277N51O52S6
Molecular Weight: 4107.20 Da
Appearance: White lyophilized solid
Solubility: water and saline buffer
CAS number:
Source: Synthetic
Purity rate: > 97 %
Reference:
Analysis of the structural and molecular basis of voltage-sensitive sodium channel inhibition by the spider toxin, Huwentoxin-IV (μ-TRTX-Hh2a)
Voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs) are essential to the normal function of the vertebrate nervous system. Aberrant function of VGSCs underlies a variety of disorders, including epilepsy, arrhythmia, and pain. A large number of animal toxins target these ion channels and may have significant therapeutic potential. Most of these toxins, however, have not been characterized in detail. Here, by combining patch clamp electrophysiology and radioligand binding studies with peptide mutagenesis, NMR structure determination, and molecular modeling, we have revealed key molecular determinants of the interaction between the tarantula toxin huwentoxin-IV and two VGSC isoforms, Nav1.7 and Nav1.2. Nine huwentoxin-IV residues (F6A, P11A, D14A, L22A, S25A, W30A, K32A, Y33A, and I35A) were important for block of Nav1.7 and Nav1.2. Importantly, molecular dynamics simulations and NMR studies indicated that folding was normal for several key mutants, suggesting that these amino acids probably make specific interactions with sodium channel residues. Additionally, we identified several amino acids (F6A, K18A, R26A, and K27A) that are involved in isoform-specific VGSC interactions. Our structural and functional data were used to model the docking of huwentoxin-IV into the domain II voltage sensor of Nav1.7. The model predicts that a hydrophobic patch composed of Trp-30 and Phe-6, along with the basic Lys-32 residue, docks into a groove formed by the Nav1.7 S1-S2 and S3-S4 loops. These results provide new insight into the structural and molecular basis of sodium channel block by huwentoxin-IV and may provide a basis for the rational design of toxin-based peptides with improved VGSC potency and/or selectivity.
Minassian NA., et al. (2013) Analysis of the structural and molecular basis of voltage-sensitive sodium channel inhibition by the spider toxin, Huwentoxin-IV (μ-TRTX-Hh2a). JBC. PMID: 23760503
Common molecular determinants of tarantula huwentoxin-IV inhibition of Na+ channel voltage sensors in domains II and IV
The voltage sensors of domains II and IV of sodium channels are important determinants of activation and inactivation, respectively. Animal toxins that alter electrophysiological excitability of muscles and neurons often modify sodium channel activation by selectively interacting with domain II and inactivation by selectively interacting with domain IV. This suggests that there may be substantial differences between the toxin-binding sites in these two important domains. Here we explore the ability of the tarantula huwentoxin-IV (HWTX-IV) to inhibit the activity of the domain II and IV voltage sensors. HWTX-IV is specific for domain II, and we identify five residues in the S1-S2 (Glu-753) and S3-S4 (Glu-811, Leu-814, Asp-816, and Glu-818) regions of domain II that are crucial for inhibition of activation by HWTX-IV. These data indicate that a single residue in the S3-S4 linker (Glu-818 in hNav1.7) is crucial for allowing HWTX-IV to interact with the other key residues and trap the voltage sensor in the closed configuration. Mutagenesis analysis indicates that the five corresponding residues in domain IV are all critical for endowing HWTX-IV with the ability to inhibit fast inactivation. Our data suggest that the toxin-binding motif in domain II is conserved in domain IV. Increasing our understanding of the molecular determinants of toxin interactions with voltage-gated sodium channels may permit development of enhanced isoform-specific voltage-gating modifiers.
Xiao, Y., et al. (2011) Common molecular determinants of tarantula huwentoxin-IV inhibition of Na+ channel voltage sensors in domains II and IV, JBC. PMID: 21659528
The tarantula toxins ProTx-II and huwentoxin-IV differentially interact with human Nav1.7 voltage sensors to inhibit channel activation and inactivation
The voltage-gated sodium channel Na(v)1.7 plays a crucial role in pain, and drugs that inhibit hNa(v)1.7 may have tremendous therapeutic potential. ProTx-II and huwentoxin-IV (HWTX-IV), cystine knot peptides from tarantula venoms, preferentially block hNa(v)1.7. Understanding the interactions of these toxins with sodium channels could aid the development of novel pain therapeutics. Whereas both ProTx-II and HWTX-IV have been proposed to preferentially block hNa(v)1.7 activation by trapping the domain II voltage-sensor in the resting configuration, we show that specific residues in the voltage-sensor paddle of domain II play substantially different roles in determining the affinities of these toxins to hNa(v)1.7. The mutation E818C increases ProTx-II‘s and HWTX-IV‘s IC(50) for block of hNa(v)1.7 currents by 4- and 400-fold, respectively. In contrast, the mutation F813G decreases ProTx-II affinity by 9-fold but has no effect on HWTX-IV affinity. It is noteworthy that we also show that ProTx-II, but not HWTX-IV, preferentially interacts with hNa(v)1.7 to impede fast inactivation by trapping the domain IV voltage-sensor in the resting configuration. Mutations E1589Q and T1590K in domain IV each decreased ProTx-II’s IC(50) for impairment of fast inactivation by ~6-fold. In contrast mutations D1586A and F1592A in domain-IV increased ProTx-II’s IC(50) for impairment of fast inactivation by ~4-fold. Our results show that whereas ProTx-II and HWTX-IV binding determinants on domain-II may overlap, domain II plays a much more crucial role for HWTX-IV, and contrary to what has been proposed to be a guiding principle of sodium channel pharmacology, molecules do not have to exclusively target the domain IV voltage-sensor to influence sodium channel inactivation.
Xiao, Y., et al. (2010) The tarantula toxins ProTx-II and huwentoxin-IV differentially interact with human Nav1.7 voltage sensors to inhibit channel activation and inactivation, Mol Pharmacol. PMID: 20855463
Mechanism of action of two insect toxins huwentoxin-III and hainantoxin-VI on voltage-gated sodium channels
Selenocosmia huwena and Selenocosmia hainana are two tarantula species found in southern China. Their venoms contain abundant peptide toxins. Two new neurotoxic peptides, huwentoxin-III (HWTX-III) and hainantoxin-VI (HNTX-VI), were obtained from the venom using ion-exchange chromatography and reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC). The mechanism of action of HWTX-III and HNTX-VI on insect neuronal voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs) was studied via whole-cell patch clamp techniques. In a fashion similar to delta-atracotoxins, HNTX-VI can induce a slowdown of current inactivation of the VGSC and reduction in the peak of Na+ current in cockroach dorsal unpaired median (DUM) neurons. Meanwhile, 10 micromol/L HNTX-IV caused a positive shift of steady-state inactivation of sodium channel. HWTX-III inhibited VGSCs on DUM neurons (concentration of toxin at half-maximal inhibition (IC(50)) approximately 1.106 micromol/L) in a way much similar to tetrodotoxin (TTX). HWTX-III had no effect on the kinetics of activation and inactivation. The shift in the steady-state inactivation curve was distinct from other depressant spider toxins. The diverse effect and the mechanism of action of the two insect toxins illustrate the diverse biological activities of spider toxins and provide a fresh theoretical foundation to design and develop novel insecticides.
Wang RL, et al. (2010) Mechanism of action of two insect toxins huwentoxin-III and hainantoxin-VI on voltage-gated sodium channels. PMID: 20506577
Tarantula huwentoxin-IV inhibits neuronal sodium channels by binding to receptor site 4 and trapping the domain ii voltage sensor in the closed configuration
Peptide toxins with high affinity, divergent pharmacological functions, and isoform-specific selectivity are powerful tools for investigating the structure-function relationships of voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs). Although a number of interesting inhibitors have been reported from tarantula venoms, little is known about the mechanism for their interaction with VGSCs. We show that huwentoxin-IV (HWTX-IV), a 35-residue peptide from tarantula Ornithoctonus huwena venom, preferentially inhibits neuronal VGSC subtypes rNav1.2, rNav1.3, and hNav1.7 compared with muscle subtypes rNav1.4 and hNav1.5. Of the five VGSCs examined, hNav1.7 was most sensitive to HWTX-IV (IC(50) approximately 26 nM). Following application of 1 microm HWTX-IV, hNav1.7 currents could only be elicited with extreme depolarizations (>+100 mV). Recovery of hNav1.7 channels from HWTX-IV inhibition could be induced by extreme depolarizations or moderate depolarizations lasting several minutes. Site-directed mutagenesis analysis indicated that the toxin docked at neurotoxin receptor site 4 located at the extracellular S3-S4 linker of domain II. Mutations E818Q and D816N in hNav1.7 decreased toxin affinity for hNav1.7 by approximately 300-fold, whereas the reverse mutations in rNav1.4 (N655D/Q657E) and the corresponding mutations in hNav1.5 (R812D/S814E) greatly increased the sensitivity of the muscle VGSCs to HWTX-IV. Our data identify a novel mechanism for sodium channel inhibition by tarantula toxins involving binding to neurotoxin receptor site 4. In contrast to scorpion beta-toxins that trap the IIS4 voltage sensor in an outward configuration, we propose that HWTX-IV traps the voltage sensor of domain II in the inward, closed configuration.
Xiao, Y., et al. (2008) Tarantula huwentoxin-IV inhibits neuronal sodium channels by binding to receptor site 4 and trapping the domain ii voltage sensor in the closed configuration, JBC. PMID: 18628201
Function and solution structure of huwentoxin-IV, a potent neuronal tetrodotoxin (TTX)-sensitive sodium channel antagonist from Chinese bird spider Selenocosmia huwena
We have isolated a highly potent neurotoxin from the venom of the Chinese bird spider, Selenocosmia huwena. This 4.1-kDa toxin, which has been named huwentoxin-IV, contains 35 residues with three disulfide bridges: Cys-2-Cys-17, Cys-9-Cys-24, and Cys-16-Cys-31, assigned by a chemical strategy including partial reduction of the toxin and sequence analysis of the modified intermediates. It specifically inhibits the neuronal tetrodotoxin-sensitive (TTX-S) voltage-gated sodium channel with the IC(50) value of 30 nm in adult rat dorsal root ganglion neurons, while having no significant effect on the tetrodotoxin-resistant (TTX-R) voltage-gated sodium channel. This toxin seems to be a site I toxin affecting the sodium channel through a mechanism quite similar to that of TTX: it suppresses the peak sodium current without altering the activation or inactivation kinetics. The three-dimensional structure of huwentoxin-IV has been determined by two-dimensional (1)H NMR combined with distant geometry and simulated annealing calculation by using 527 nuclear Overhauser effect constraints and 14 dihedral constraints. The resulting structure is composed of a double-stranded antiparallel beta-sheet (Leu-22-Ser-25 and Trp-30-Tyr-33) and four turns (Glu-4-Lys-7, Pro-11-Asp-14, Lys-18-Lys-21 and Arg-26-Arg-29) and belongs to the inhibitor cystine knot structural family. After comparison with other toxins purified from the same species, we are convinced that the positively charged residues of loop IV (residues 25-29), especially residue Arg-26, must be crucial to its binding to the neuronal tetrodotoxin-sensitive voltage-gated sodium channel.
Peng, K., et al. (2002) Function and solution structure of huwentoxin-IV, a potent neuronal tetrodotoxin (TTX)-sensitive sodium channel antagonist from Chinese bird spider Selenocosmia huwena, J Biol Chem.PMID: 12228241
Smartox's citation : A natural point mutation changes both target selectivity and mechanism of action of sea anemone toxins
APETx3, a novel peptide isolated from the sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima, is a naturally occurring mutant from APETx1, only differing by a Thr to Pro substitution at position 3. APETx1 is believed to be a selective modulator of human ether-á-go-go related gene (hERG) potassium channels with a K(d) of 34 nM. In this study, APETx1, 2, and 3 have been subjected to an electrophysiological screening on a wide range of 24 ion channels expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes: 10 cloned voltage-gated sodium channels (Na(V) 1.2-Na(V)1.8, the insect channels DmNa(V)1, BgNa(V)1-1a, and the arachnid channel VdNa(V)1) and 14 cloned voltage-gated potassium channels (K(V)1.1-K(V)1.6, K(V)2.1, K(V)3.1, K(V)4.2, K(V)4.3, K(V)7.2, K(V)7.4, hERG, and the insect channel Shaker IR). Surprisingly, the Thr3Pro substitution results in a complete abolishment of APETx3 modulation on hERG channels and provides this toxin the ability to become a potent (EC(50) 276 nM) modulator of voltage-gated sodium channels (Na(V)s) because it slows down the inactivation of mammalian and insect Na(V) channels. Our study also shows that the homologous toxins APETx1 and APETx2 display promiscuous properties since they are also capable of recognizing Na(V) channels with IC(50) values of 31 nM and 114 nM, respectively, causing an inhibition of the sodium conductance without affecting the inactivation. Our results provide new insights in key residues that allow these sea anemone toxins to recognize distinct ion channels with similar potency but with different modulatory effects. Furthermore, we describe for the first time the target promiscuity of a family of sea anemone toxins thus far believed to be highly selective.
Peigneur S, et al. (2012) A natural point mutation changes both target selectivity and mechanism of action of sea anemone toxins. FASEB J. PMID: 22972919
ebiomall.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
拼音名:Chunhuashui
英文名:PurifiedWater
【性状】本品为无色的澄清液体;无臭,无味。
【检查】酸碱度取本品10ml,加甲基红指示液2滴,不得显红色;另取10ml,加溴麝香草酚蓝指示液5滴,不得显蓝色。氯化物、流酸盐与钙盐取本品,分置三支试管中,每管各50ml。第一管中加硝酸5滴与硝酸银试液1ml,第二管中加氯化钡试液2ml,第三管中加草酸铵试液2ml,均不得发生浑浊。
硝酸盐取本品5ml置试管中,于冰浴中冷却,加10%氯化钾溶液0.4ml与0.1%二苯胺硫酸溶液0.1ml,摇匀,缓缓滴加硫酸5ml,摇匀,将试管子50℃水浴中放置15分钟,溶液产生的蓝色与标准硝酸盐溶液[取硝酸钾0.163g,加水溶解并稀释至100ml,摇匀,精密量取1ml,加水稀释成100ml,再精密量取10ml,加水稀释成100ml,摇匀,即得(每1ml相当于1pgNO3)0.3ml,加无硝酸盐的水4.7ml,用同一方法处理后的颜色比较,不得更深(0.000006%)。
亚硝酸盐取本品10ml,置纳氏管中,加对氨基苯磺酰胺的稀盐酸溶液(1→100)lml与盐酸菜乙H肢溶液(0.l+100)1ml,产生的粉红色,与标准亚硝酸盐溶液〔取亚硝酸钠0.750g(按干燥品计算),加水溶解,稀释至100ml,摇匀,精密量取1ml,加水稀释成100ml,摇匀,再精密量取1ml,加水稀释成50ml,摇匀,即得(每1ml相当于1μgNO2)]0.2ml,加无亚硝酸盐的水9.8ml,用同一方法处理后的颜色比较,不得更深(0.000002%)。
氨取本品50ml,加碱性碘化汞钾试液2ml,放置15分钟;如显色,与氯化铵溶液(取氯化铵31.5mg,加无氨水适量使溶解并稀释成1000ml)1.5ml,加元氨水48ml与碱性碘化汞钾试液2ml制成的对照液比较,不得更深(0.00003%)。
二氧化碳取本品25ml,置50ml具塞量筒中,加氢氧化钙试液25ml,密塞振摇,放置,小时内不得发生浑浊。
易氧化物取本品100ml,加稀硫酸10ml,煮沸后,加高锰酸钾滴定液(0.02mol/L)0.10ml,再煮沸10分钟,粉红色不得完全消失。
不挥发物取本品100ml,置105℃恒重的蒸发皿中,在水浴上蒸干,并在105℃干燥至恒重,遗留残渣不得过1mg。
重金属取本品50ml,加水18.5ml,蒸发至20ml,放冷,加醋酸盐缓冲液(pH3.5)2ml与水适量使成25ml,加硫代乙酰胺试液2ml,摇匀,放置2分钟,与标准铅溶液1.5ml加水18.5ml用同一方法处理后的颜色比较,不得更深(0.00003%)。
微生物限度取本品,采用薄膜过滤法处理后,依法检查(附录ⅪJ),细菌、霉菌和酵母菌总数每1ml不得过100个。
【贮藏】密闭保存。
【化学成分】本品为蒸馏法、离子交换法、反渗透法或其他适宜的方法制得的供药用的水,不含任何附加剂。
【分子式与分子量】H2O18.02
【药理作用】溶剂、稀释剂
这里药典纯化水标准中并无PH值项目,请问对纯化水有PH值的要求吗,范围应在多少?请说明出处?
在纯化水检测中,检验酸碱度合格,但是发现PH在8左右。如果按以上标准检验合格,是否要考虑PH值?请知道的解答,谢谢!
:)
我在做一细菌不同酸碱度生长状况时,发现这些奇怪现象:pH=3的培养基灭菌(TSB液体培养基)灭菌后pH上升到到9.2!而原来pH=9.0的降到8.7(基本没多少变化),请问各位大侠,这是什么原因?
一般做不同酸碱度生长实验时,该如何才能防止pH在湿热灭菌后基本不变化?
是否可以理解为纯化水得PH范围为6.3-7.6?能否直接用pH计测量?谢谢!
1、弱酸和它的盐(如:HAc---NaAc)的水溶液组成;
2、弱碱和它的盐(如:NH3·H2O---NH4Cl)的水溶液组成;
3、多元弱酸的酸式盐及其对应的次级盐(如:NaH2PO4---Na2HPO4)的水溶液组成。
酸碱缓冲溶液的选型一般应根据具体情况进行选择。缓冲酸性可选用碱性缓冲液,缓冲酸性可采用碱性缓冲液。常用作缓冲溶液的酸类由弱酸及其共轭酸盐组合成的溶液具有缓冲作用。生化实验室常用的缓冲系主要有磷酸、柠檬酸、碳酸、醋酸、巴比妥酸、Tris(三羟甲基氨基甲烷)等系统,生化实验或研究工作中要慎重地选择缓冲体系,因为有时影响实验结果的因素并不是缓冲液的pH值,而是缓冲液中的某种离子。如硼酸盐、柠檬酸盐、磷酸盐和三羟甲基甲烷等缓冲剂都可能产生不需要的化学反应。
【酸碱缓冲溶液】由弱酸及其盐、弱碱及其盐组成的混合溶液,能在一定程度上抵消、减轻外加强酸或强碱对溶液酸碱度的影响,从而保持溶液的pH值相对稳定。这种溶液称为酸碱缓冲溶液。
由弱酸及其盐、弱碱及其盐组成的混合溶液,能在一定程度上抵消、减轻外加强酸或强碱对溶液酸碱度的影响,从而保持溶液的pH值相对稳定。这种溶液称为缓冲溶液。
两个CEX方法A和B测定同一单抗,结果碱性峰比例差不多,酸性峰比例相差约7%,相应主峰也差了7%左右。
具体来说,A方法酸性峰高,主峰低,碱性峰稍微低点;B方法酸性峰低,主峰高,碱性峰稍微高点;另外也做了CIEF,结果呢和A方法更接近。
仔细比较起来,AB两个方法的峰性和数量差不多,就不知道为什么会有这么大的差异。两个方法一个用的WCX柱-磷酸缓冲液,一个用SCX柱-MES缓冲液
大家帮我分析下:
1.两个方法哪个方法更准确,是以酸性峰高的为准还是什么?为什么?
2.这显著差异是由方法造成,具体原因是什么?柱子?
3.CIEF的结果和A方法更接近,是不是可以由此证明A方法更好或者CIEF的方法更好(因为CIEF更快更方便)?
欢迎讨论~
纠正下,A方法用的是Tosoh的柱子,B方法用的是SCX柱。TOSOH的柱子是7um的填料,10cm长。SCX是10um的填料。我本人TOSOH的阳离子柱子用的很少,这次信手用用,结果发现差异很大
那我现在就考虑,在以后方法开发过程中,除了通过流动相pH和组成、梯度、柱子选择来获得样品主峰和酸碱性的最大分离,还要关注各峰比例。因为之前比较方法好坏都只看分离度,尤其是主峰和邻近峰的分离度,获得最大分离度,自然可以做到主峰尽可能纯,但从未认真比较过各峰比例。这是一个大疏忽吧!
另外,CIEF和CEX方法原理还是有点差异的,所以分的是不同的异质体,原液放行两个方法肯定是都要做的。问题就是在早期细胞株筛选和工艺开发阶段,哪个方法才是又快又准。CIEF(iCE280)一般15分钟一个样,比CEX快多了。如果CIEF测得主峰要低于CEX结果,是不是真的完全可以取代CEX呢?CEX分离出的峰远比CIEF的多!
欢迎大家继续讨论~
这就是说不用酸碱预处理吗?
Whatman的网站上没有DE52最大耐受压力,请问又经验的战友应该是多少?
Whatman的网站上:
DE32DryMicrogranularDEAECellulose
SimilarperformancecharacteristicsafterprecyclingasDE52.
DE52PreswollenMicrogranularDEAECellulose
ProbablythemostwidelyusedDEAEcelluloseintheworld;usedforbiopolymerswithlowtohighnegativecharges;exhibitsexcellentresolutionwithgoodflowrates.
附件是一本图书(MethodsinMolecularMedicine,)的章节,上面说:
WhatmanDEAE52comesalreadypreswollenandonlyneedstobetransferred
totherunningbuffer50mMTE8.
lAntibodiesUsingIonExchangeChromatography.pdf(87.06k)
pH(1)=pKa+lg[c(CH₃COONa)/c(CH₃COOH)]=pKa=4.74
通HCl后,溶液是c(CH₃COOH)=0.2mol/L、c(NaCl)=0.1mol/L的混合溶液,溶液pH按照弱酸溶液pH的求法求.
c(H⁺)=√[Ka*c(CH₃COOH)]=√(10^-4.74*0.2)=0.00191(mol/L)(采用了近似公式)
pH(2)=-lg{c(H⁺)}=2.72
两个pH求得,那么pH的变化量也就可得了.pH的变化量=|pH(2)-pH(1)|=|2.72-4.74|=2.02
1)PH缓冲溶液作用原理和pH值
当往某些溶液中加入一定量的酸和碱时,有阻碍溶液pH变化的作用,称为缓冲作用,这样的溶液叫做缓冲溶液.弱酸及其盐的混合溶液(如HAc与NaAc),弱碱及其盐的混合溶液(如NH3·H2O与NH4Cl)等都是缓冲溶液.
由弱酸HA及其盐NaA所组成的缓冲溶液对酸的缓冲作用,是由于溶液中存在足够量的碱A-的缘故.当向这种溶液中加入一定量的强酸时,H离子基本上被A-离子消耗:
所以溶液的pH值几乎不变;当加入一定量强碱时,溶液中存在的弱酸HA消耗OH-离子而阻碍pH的变化.
2)PH缓冲溶液的缓冲能力
在缓冲溶液中加入少量强酸或强碱,其溶液pH值变化不大,但若加入酸,碱的量多时,缓冲溶液就失去了它的缓冲作用.这说明它的缓冲能力是有一定限度的.
缓冲溶液的缓冲能力与组成缓冲溶液的组分浓度有关.0.1mol·L-1HAc和0.1mol·L-1NaAc组成的缓冲溶液,比0.01mol·L-1HAc和0.01mol·L-1NaAc的缓冲溶液缓冲能力大.关于这一点通过计算便可证实.但缓冲溶液组分的浓度不能太大,否则,不能忽视离子间的作用.
组成缓冲溶液的两组分的比值不为1∶1时,缓冲作用减小,缓冲能力降低,当c(盐)/c(酸)为1∶1时△pH最小,缓冲能力大.不论对于酸或碱都有较大的缓冲作用.缓冲溶液的pH值可用下式计算:
此时缓冲能力大.缓冲组分的比值离1∶1愈远,缓冲能力愈小,甚至不能起缓冲作用.对于任何缓冲体系,存在有效缓冲范围,这个范围大致在pKaφ(或pKbφ)两侧各一个pH单位之内.
弱酸及其盐(弱酸及其共轭碱)体系pH=pKaφ±1
弱碱及其盐(弱碱及其共轭酸)体系pOH=pKbφ±1
例如HAc的pKaφ为4.76,所以用HAc和NaAc适宜于配制pH为3.76~5.76的缓冲溶液,在这个范围内有较大的缓冲作用.配制pH=4.76的缓冲溶液时缓冲能力最大,此时(c(HAc)/c(NaAc)=1.
3)PH缓冲溶液的配制和应用
为了配制一定pH的缓冲溶液,首先选定一个弱酸,它的pKaφ尽可能接近所需配制的缓冲溶液的pH值,然后计算酸与碱的浓度比,根据此浓度比便可配制所需缓冲溶液.
以上主要以弱酸及其盐组成的缓冲溶液为例说明它的作用原理、pH计算和配制方法.对于弱碱及其盐组成的缓冲溶液可采用相同的方法.
PH缓冲溶液在物质分离和成分分析等方面应用广泛,如鉴定Mg2离子时,可用下面的反应:
白色磷酸铵镁沉淀溶于酸,故反应需在碱性溶液中进行,但碱性太强,可能生成白色Mg(OH)2沉淀,所以反应的pH值需控制在一定范围内,因此利用NH3·H2O和NH4Cl组成的缓冲溶液,保持溶液的pH值条件下,进行上述反应.

![]()
暂无品牌分类
