Technical Documents
Description
Most popular non-nucleosidic phosphoramidites for modification and labeling are based on two structural types: 1,2-diols and 1,3-diols. Products based on a 1,2-diol backbone were first described to allow amino-modification and biotin labeling. Technically, the 1,2-diol backbone has some drawbacks relative to the 1,3-diol backbone. The 1,2-diol backbone can participate in a dephosphorylation reaction since the 1,2-diol can form a favored 5-membered cyclic phosphate intermediate. This reaction is competitive with simple hydrolysis of the protecting groups and leads to some loss of label. However, the degree of loss at the 3’ terminus can be limited by the removal of the cyanoethyl protecting group using DBU or diethylamine prior to the cleavage and deprotection steps. Similarly, loss at the 5’ terminus can be eliminated by retaining the DMT group until the oligo is fully deprotected. Fortunately, the elimination reaction is virtually non-existent in the 1,3-diol backbone since the cyclic intermediate would be a 6-membered ring which is not favored for a cyclic phosphate intermediate.
IVD customers have requested a new backbone based on a 1,3-diol that would overcome any technical or IP issues surrounding our current products. We now offer a line of products based on the serinol backbone, which have been developed in close collaboration between Glen Research and Nelson Biotechnologies. Protected Biotin Serinol Phosphoramidite and CPG are protected with a t-butylbenzoyl group on the biotin ring. This group is designed to stop any phosphoramidite reactions at this active position in biotin. This protection avoids branching when using nucleophilic activators like DCI. The protecting group is easily removed during oligonucleotide cleavage and deprotection. The BiotinLC versions are similarly protected and should be useful for the synthesis of highly sensitive biotinylated probes. 6-Fluorescein Serinol Phosphoramidite and CPG are designed to prepare oligonucleotides containing one or several 6-Fluorescein (6-FAM) residues. Amino-Modifier Serinol Phosphoramidite and CPG are used to add amino groups into one or several positions in oligonucleotides. The amino group is protected with Fmoc, which may be removed on the synthesis column prior to solid-phase conjugation to the amino groups, or which may be removed during deprotection for subsequent solution phase conjugation to the amino groups.
Combining lipoic acid and our patented serinol backbone, we now offer Dithiol Serinol Phosphoramidite and the related 3’-Dithiol Serinol CPG. This unique architecture moves the bulky dithiol away from the phosphate backbone, making it suitable for conjugation to gold surfaces. The long spacer arm of Dithiol Serinol also allows multiple consecutive incorporations of the modifier without the need for intermediate spacer phosphoramidite additions to achieve optimal stepwise coupling efficiency.
Details
Usage
- Coupling: 12 minute coupling time recommended. Note the DBCO Serinol is susceptible to damage by iodine during oxidation. To prevent loss of the DBCO label, use 0.5M CSO in anhydrous acetonitrile (40-4632-xx) and a 3 minute oxidation time for best results.
- Deprotection: Ammonium hydroxide for 2 hr at 65 �C or as required by nucleobases
| Specifications | |
|---|---|
| Diluent | Anhydrous Acetonitrile |
| Storage | Storage: Freezer storage, -10 to -30�C, dry |
| Stability | 1-2 Days |
Intellectual Property
"
Dilution/Coupling Data
The table below show pack size data and, for solutions, dilution and approximate coupling based on normal priming procedures.
ABI 392/394
| Catalog # | Pack Size | Grams/Pack | 0.1M Dil. (mL) | Approximate Number of Additions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LV40 | LV200 | 40nm | 0.2μm | 1μm | 10μm | ||||
| 10-1998-02 | 0.25 g | 0.25 | 2.75 | 78.33 | 47 | 29.38 | 21.36 | 15.67 | 3.92 |
| 10-1998-90 | 100 µmol | 0.09 | 1 | 20 | 12 | 7.5 | 5.45 | 4 | 1 |
| 10-1998-95 | 50 µmol | 0.05 | 0.5 | 3.33 | 2 | 1.25 | 0.91 | 0.67 | 0.17 |
Expedite
| Catalog # | Pack Size | Grams/Pack | Dilution (mL) | Approximate Number of Additions | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molarity | 50nm | 0.2μm | 1μm | 15μm | ||||
| 10-1998-02 | 0.25 g | 0.25 | 4.1 | 0.07 | 75.6 | 47.25 | 34.36 | 4.73 |
| 10-1998-90 | 100 µmol | 0.09 | 1.5 | 0.07 | 23.6 | 14.75 | 10.73 | 1.48 |
| 10-1998-95 | 50 µmol | 0.05 | 0.75 | 0.07 | 8.6 | 5.38 | 3.91 | 0.54 |
Related Products
Related Products
ebiomall.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
名称：氨氧基乙酸盐;羧甲氧基胺半盐酸盐；
分子式：C2H5NO3·0.5HCl
分子质量：109.30
熔点：156℃
果糖胺是血浆中的蛋白质与葡萄糖非酶糖化过程中形成的高分子酮胺结构类似果糖胺的物质，它的浓度与血糖水平成正相关，并相对保持稳定。它的测定却不受血糖的影响。由于血浆蛋白的半衰期为17～20天，故果糖胺可以反映糖尿病患者检测前1～3周内的平均血糖水平。从一定程度上弥补了糖化血红蛋白不能反映较短时期内血糖浓度变化的不足。果糖胺的测定快速而价廉（化学法），是评价糖尿病控制情况的一个良好指标，尤其是对血糖波动较大的脆性糖尿病及妊娠糖尿病，了解其平均血糖水平有实际意义。但果糖胺不受每次进食的影响，所以不能用来直接指导每日胰岛素及口服降糖药的用量。血清果糖胺正常值为1.64～2.64mmol/L，血浆中果糖胺较血清低0.3mmol/L。
【认领须知】
1、认领翻译的战友请跟帖注明“认领本文翻译，48小时内未完成，请其他战友认领！”
2、请根据自己专业背景选择认领，如使用翻译软件翻译，被发现者扣分1-2分
3、经常认领而不能及时提供优质稿件者将被列入黑名单，取消认领资格，请大家注意！
4、翻译时请参照版规：点击查看
5、在首位认领战友未超过规定时间的其他任何认领属违规认领，将不会给予丁当或加分！
6、翻译完成后加分（或丁当）的时限为三日，请耐心等待，若超过时限未加者可进行申诉：点击进入
7、本文题目仅供译者参考，篇幅较长者可申请适当延时
8、翻译前请查一下有无重复帖
9、为保证翻译质量，每人每天最多只能认领两篇
10、链接:http://www.ascopost.com/News/48387
FDAApprovesLenalidomideasMaintenanceTherapyforPatientsWithMultipleMyelomaFollowingAutologousStemCellTransplant
OnFebruary22,theU.S.FoodandDrugAdmiNISTration(FDA)expandedtheexistingindicationforlenalidomide(Revlimid)10mgcapsulestoincludeuseforpatientswithmultiplemyelomaasmaintenancetherapyfollowingautologoushematopoieticstemcelltransplant.TheexpandedindicationmakeslenalidomidethefirstandonlytreatmenttoreceiveFDAapprovalformaintenanceusefollowingautologoushematopoieticstemcelltransplant.
“Autologousstemcelltransplantafterinductiontherapyispartofthecontinuumofcarefortransplant-eligIBLe[patientswith]multiplemyeloma.However,mostpatientswillstillseetheirdiseaserecurorprogressafterthistreatment,”saidPhilipMcCarthy,MD,Director,BloodandMarrowTransplantCenter,DepartmentofMedicineatRoswellParkCancerInstitute.“Lenalidomidemaintenancetherapy,whichhasbeenshowntoincreaseprogression-freesurvivalfollowingautologousstemcelltransplantinclinicaltrials,canbeconsideredastandardofcareforthesepatients.”
ClinicalTrialFindings
Theapprovalwasbasedontwolargestudies—CALGB100104andIFM2005-02—includingmorethan1,000patientscomparinglenalidomidemaintenancetherapygivenuntildiseaseprogressionorunacceptabletoxicityafterautologoushematopoieticstemcelltransplantvsnomaintenance.Inbothstudies,theprimaryefficacyendpointwasprogression-freesurvival.
Inthemostcurrentprogression-freesurvivalanalysis,Study1(CALGB100104)demonstratedamedianprogression-freesurvivalof5.7years(95%confidenceinterval[CI]=4.4–notestimable)vs1.9years(95%CI=1.6–2.5)fornomaintenance,adifferenceof3.8years(hazardratio[HR]=0.38;95%CI=0.28–0.50).
Study2(IFM2005-02)alsoshowedabenefitwithamedianprogression-freesurvivalof3.9years(95%CI=3.3–4.7)vs2years(95%CI=1.8–2.3)fornomaintenance,adifferenceof1.9years(HR=0.53;95%CI=0.44–0.64).
Individualstudieswerenotpoweredforanoverallsurvivalendpoint.
AdescriptiveanalysisshowedthemedianoverallsurvivalinStudy1was9.3years(95%CI=8.5–notestimable)forpatientswhoreceivedlenalidomidevs7years(95%CI=5.9–8.6)fornomaintenance(HR=0.59;95%CI=0.4–0.78).InStudy2,medianoverallsurvivalwas8.8years(95%CI=7.4–notestimable)forpatientswhoreceivedlenalidomidevs7.3years(95%CI=6.7–9.0)fornomaintenance(HR=0.90;95%CI=0.72–1.13).
AdverseEvents
Themostfrequentlyreportedadversereactionsin≥20%(lenalidomidearm)acrossbothmaintenancestudies(Study1,Study2respectively)wereneutropenia(79%,61%);thrombocytopenia(72%,24%);leukopenia(23%,32%);anemia(21%,9%);upperrespiratorytractinfection(27%,11%);bronchitis(5%,47%);nasopharyngitis(2%,35%);cough(10%,27%);gastroenteritis(0%,23%);diarrhea(55%,39%);rash(32%,8%);fatigue(23%,11%);asthenia(0%,30%);musclespasm(0%,33%);andpyrexia(8%,21%).ThemostfrequentlyreportedGrade3or4reactions(morethan20%inthelenalidomidearm)includedneutropenia,thrombocytopenia,andleukopenia.
Thefrequenciesofonsetofadversereactionsweregenerallyhighestinthefirst6monthsoftreatmentandthenthefrequenciesdecreasedovertimeorremainedstablethroughouttreatment.
Inpatientsreceivinglenalidomidemaintenancetherapy,hematologicsecondprimarymalignanciesoccurredin7.5%ofpatientscomparedto3.3%inpatientsreceivingplacebo.Theincidenceofhematologicplussolidtumor(excludingsquamouscellcarcinomaandbasalcellcarcinoma)secondprimarymalignancieswas14.9%,comparedto8.8%inpatientsreceivingplacebowithamedianfollow-upof91.5months.Nonmelanomaskincancersecondprimarymalignancies,includingsquamouscellcarcinomaandbasalcellcarcinoma,occurredin3.9%ofpatientsreceivinglenalidomidemaintenance,comparedto2.6%intheplaceboarm.
【认领须知】
1、认领翻译的战友请跟帖注明“认领本文翻译，48小时内未完成，请其他战友认领！”
2、请根据自己专业背景选择认领，如使用翻译软件翻译，被发现者扣分1-2分
3、经常认领而不能及时提供优质稿件者将被列入黑名单，取消认领资格，请大家注意！
4、翻译时请参照版规：点击查看互
5、在首位认领战友未超过规定时间的其他任何认领属违规认领，将不会给予丁当或加分！
6、翻译完成后加分（或丁当）的时限为三日，请耐心等待，若超过时限未加者可进行申诉：点击进入
7、本文题目仅供译者参考，篇幅较长者可申请适当延时
8、翻译前请查一下有无重复帖
9、为保证翻译质量，每人每天最多只能认领两篇
10、链接：http://www.ascopost.com/News/57763
ICML2017:PhaseIIIbMAGNIFYStudyofLenalidomideandRituximabCombinationinRelapsed/RefractoryFollicularandMarginalZoneLymphoma
AninterimanalysisofMAGNIFY,aphaseIIIb,randomized,open-label,multicenterstudyoftheR2combinationregimen(lenalidomide[Revlimid]plusrituximab[Rituxan])inpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymarginalzonelymphoma,waspresentedattheInternationalConferenceonMalignantLymphoma(ICML)inLugano,Switzerland.ThisanalysisexpandedupondatapresentedearlierinthemonthattheASCOAnnualMeeting(Abstract7502).
TheMAGNIFYstudycontinuestoevaluatetheclinicalactivityof12cyclesofR2combinationtherapyfollowedbyrandomizationtoeither18cyclesofR2maintenanceor18cyclesofrituximabmonotherapy,inpatientswithrelapsedorrefractoryfollicularlymphoma,marginalzonelymphoma,ormantlecelllymphoma.Approximately500patientsareplannedtobeenrolledinthestudy.
Theprimaryendpointisprogression-freesurvival.Secondaryendpointsincludeoverallsurvival,overallresponserate,completeresponse,improvementofresponse,durationofresponse,durationofcompleteresponse,timetonextlymphomatreatment,timetohistologictransformation,safety,andexploratoryquality-of-lifemeasures.EnrollmentintheMAGNIFYstudyisongoing.
ASCOData
AttheASCOAnnualMeeting,interimdatawerepresentedfromananalysisofasubsetofpatientsfromtheMAGNIFYstudywithrelapsedorrefractoryfollicularlymphoma(n=160)withearly-relapse(n=52)anddouble-refractory(n=50)disease.
AttheJanuary9,2017,datacutoff,the1-yearprogression-freesurvivalforallfollicularlymphomapatientswas70%,with65%fordouble-refractorypatientsand49%forearly-relapsepatients.Additionally,evaluablefollicularlymphomapatients(n=128)hadanoverallresponserateof66%withacompleteresponse/completeresponse–unconfirmedrateof38%.Fordouble-refractorypatients(n=42),overallresponseratewas45%withacompleteresponse/completeresponse–unconfirmedrateof21%andforearly-relapsepatients(n=43),overallresponseratewas47%withacompleteresponse/completeresponse–unconfirmedrateof21%.Mediandurationofresponsewasnotmetatamedianfollow-upof10.2months.
Themostcommongrade3or4adverseeventsobservedinthestudyforallfollicularlymphoma,double-refractory,andearly-relapsepatients,respectively,wereneutropenia(29%,42%,37%),fatigue(6%,4%,8%),leukopenia(5%,8%,10%),thrombocytopenia(4%,8%,4%),andlymphopenia(3%,6%,4%).
ICMLData
DatapresentedatICMLinaseparateanalysisfocusedonpatientswithmarginalzonelymphoma(n=38),includingnodalmarginalzonelymphoma(n=18),splenicmarginalzonelymphoma(n=10),andmucosa-associatedlymphoidtissuelymphoma(n=10).
Atamedianfollow-upof13.8monthsfrominitiationoftherapywiththeR2combination,evaluablepatientswithmarginalzonelymphoma(n=32)achievedanoverallresponserateof66%withacompleteresponse/completeresponse–unconfirmedrateof44%.Evaluablenodalmarginalzonelymphomapatients(n=14)hadanoverallresponserateof57%withacompleteresponse/completeresponse–unconfirmedrateof57%.Evaluablesplenicmarginalzonelymphomapatients(n=8)hadanoverallresponserateof63%withacompleteresponserateof25%;andevaluablemucosa-associatedlymphoidtissuelymphomapatients(n=10)hadanoverallresponserateof80%withacompleteresponse/completeresponse–unconfirmedrateof40%.Mediandurationofresponsewasnotreachedforanygroup.
Themostcommongrade3or4adverseeventsobservedinpatientswithmarginalzonelymphomawereneutropenia(32%),thrombocytopenia(16%),andleukopenia(11%).
“Thechemotherapy-freecombinationoflenalidomideandrituximab,withcomplementarymechanismsofactionthatarethoughttoenhanceantibodydependentcellularcytotoxicity,continuestoshowencouragingactivityandatolerablesafetyprofileinindolentlymphomas,andparticularlyindifficult-to-treatpatientsubsets,”saidDavidJ.Andorsky,MD,co–principalinvestigatorofthestudyandmedicaloncologistattheRockyMountainCancerCentersinBoulder,Colorado.“Theseresultsinpatientswhohadfailedmultipletherapiesorrelapsedearly,aswellastheactivityinmarginalzonepatientsmeritfurtherstudyinthisareaofindolentlymphoma.”
AboutMAGNIFY
MAGNIFYisaphaseIIIb,multicenter,open-labelstudyofpatientswithgrades1–3bortransformedfollicularlymphoma,marginalzonelymphoma,ormantlecelllymphomawhoreceivedatleast1priortherapyandhadstageI–IV,measurabledisease.Approximately500patientsareplannedforenrollmentin12cyclesofR2induction,withaprojected314patientswithatleaststablediseaseafterinductionrandomized(1:1)to2maintenancearms.
Inductionincludesorallenalidomideat20mg/d,days1–21per28-daycycle(d1–21/28)plusintravenousrituximabat375mg/m2,days1,8,15,and22ofcycle1andday1ofcycles3,5,7,9,and11(28-daycycles).Patientsarethenrandomizedtomaintenancelenalidomideat10mg/d,days1to21/28,cycles13to30,plusrituximabat375mg/m2,day1ofcycles13,15,17,19,21,23,25,27,and29(R2,armA),orrituximabalone(sameschedule,armB).PatientsreceivingR2maintenanceafter18cyclesmaycontinuemaintenancelenalidomidemonotherapyat10mg/d,days1–21/28(perpatientand/orinvestigatordiscretion),untildiseaseprogressionastolerated.Patientswillbefollowedfor≥5yearsafterthelastpatientinitiatesinductiontherapy.
如题，之前买的sigma的粉末，太贵。加培养基又不方便
【认领须知】
1、认领翻译的战友请跟帖注明“认领本文翻译，48小时内未完成，请其他战友认领！”
2、请根据自己专业背景选择认领，如使用翻译软件翻译，被发现者扣分1-2分
3、经常认领而不能及时提供优质稿件者将被列入黑名单，取消认领资格，请大家注意！
4、翻译时请参照版规：点击查看
5、在首位认领战友未超过规定时间的其他任何认领属违规认领，将不会给予丁当或加分！
6、翻译完成后加分（或丁当）的时限为三日，请耐心等待，若超过时限未加者可进行申诉：点击进入
7、本文题目仅供译者参考，篇幅较长者可申请适当延时
8、翻译前请查一下有无重复帖
9、为保证翻译质量，每人每天最多只能认领两篇
原文链接：http://www.ascopost.com/News/40561
AdditionofIxazomibtoLenalidomide/DexamethasoneImprovesProgression-FreeSurvivalinRelapsed/RefractoryMultipleMyeloma
Moreauetalfoundthataddingtheoralproteasomeinhibitorixazomib(Ninlaro)tolenalidomide(Revlimid)anddexamethasonesignificantlyprolongedprogression-freesurvivalamongpatientswithrelapsed,refractory,orrelapsedandrefractorymultiplemyeloma.TheyreportedthefindingsfromthephaseIIITOURMALINE-MM1trialinTheNewEnglandJournalofMedicine.ThetrialsupportedtherecentU.S.FoodandDrugAdmiNISTration(FDA)approvalofixazomibinpreviouslytreatedmultiplemyeloma,makingitthefirstapprovedoralproteasomeinhibitor.
StudyDetails
Inthedouble-blindtrial,722patientsfrom147sitesin26countrieswererandomizedbetweenAugust2012andMay272014toreceiveixazomib(n=360)orplacebo(n=362)pluslenalidomideanddexamethasone.Treatmentconsistedof28-daycyclesoforalixazomibat4mgorplaceboondays1,8,and15;orallenalidomideat25mgondays1through21(10mginthosewithcreatinineclearance≤60or≤50mL/min/1.73m2accordingtolocalprescribinginformation);andoraldexamethasoneat40mgondays1,8,15,and22.Theprimaryendpointwasprogression-freesurvival.
Fortheixazomibvsplacebogroups,medianagewas66yearsinboth(53%vs51%>65years);58%vs56%weremale;86%vs83%werewhite;EasternCooperativeOncologyGroupperformancestatuswas0or1in95%vs93%;InternationalStagingSystem(ISS)stagewasIin63%vs64%,IIin25%vs24%,andIIIin12%inboth;78%vs72%hadcreatinineclearance≥60mL/min/1.73m2;55%vs60%hadstandard-and21%vs17%hadhigh-riskcytogenetics;numberofpriortherapieswas1in62%vs60%,2in27%vs31%,and3in11%vs9%;59%vs55%hadpriorstemcelltransplantation;diseasecategorywasrelapsedin77%inboth,refractoryin12%vs11%,relapsedandrefractoryin11%vs12%,andprimaryrefractoryin7%vs6%;priorproteasomeinhibitortherapywasbortezomib(Velcade)in69%inbothandcarfilzomib(Kyprolis)in<1%vs1%,with1%vs2%ofpatientshavingdiseaserefractorytopriortreatment;andpriorimmunomodulatorytherapywaslenalidomidein54%vs56%andthalidomide(Thalomid)in44%vs47%,with21%vs25%havingdiseaserefractorytopriortherapy.
ImprovedProgression-FreeSurvival
Aftermedianfollow-upof14.7months,medianprogression-freesurvivalwas20.6monthsintheixazomibgroupvs14.7monthsintheplacebogroup(hazardratio[HR]=0.74,P=.01).Benefitofixazomibwasconsistentacrossprespecifiedsubgroups,includingpoor-prognosissubgroupssuchasthosewithhigh-riskcytogenetics(24.1vs9.7months,HR=0.54),ISSstageIIIdisease(18.4vs10.1months,HR=0.72),thoseaged>75years(18.5vs13.1months,HR=0.87),andthosewhohadreceivedtwo(17.5vs14.1months,HR=0.75)orthree(notestimablevs10.2months,HR=0.37)priortherapies.
Overallresponserateswere78%vs72%,withtheratesofcompleteresponseplusverygoodpartialresponseof48%vs39%.Mediantimetoresponsewas1.1vs1.9months.Mediandurationofresponsewas20.5vs15.0months.Atmedianfollow-upofapproximately23months,medianoverallsurvivalhadnotbeenreachedineithergroup.
AdverseEvents
Adverseeventsof≥grade3occurredin74%oftheixazomibgroupvs69%oftheplacebogroup,withthemostcommonintheixazomibgroupbeingneutropenia(23%vs24%)andthrombocytopenia(19%vs9%).Rashofanygradewasmorecommonintheixazomibgroup(36%vs23%),asweregastrointestinaladverseevents(mostlylowgrade);22%ofixazomibpatientsand19%ofplacebopatientsreceivedantidiarrhealagents,and21%and13%receivedantiemeticdrugs.Peripheralneuropathyofanygradeoccurredin27%vs22%(grade3in2%ineach).
Seriousadverseeventsoccurredin47%vs49%.Adverseeventsledtodosereductionofanydrugin56%vs50%,discontinuationofanydrugin25%vs20%,anddiscontinuationofthestudyregimenin17%vs14%.Deathoccurredduringthestudyperiodin4%vs6%.
Theinvestigatorsconcluded:“Theadditionofixazomibtoaregimenoflenalidomideanddexamethasonewasassociatedwithsignificantlylongerprogression-freesurvival;theadditionaltoxiceffectswiththisall-oralregimenwerelimited.”
