
Technical Documents
Description
Locked Nucleic Acid (LNA) was first described by Wengel and co-workers in 19981 as a novel class of conformationally restricted oligonucleotide analogues. LNA is a bicyclic nucleic acid where a ribonucleoside is linked between the 2’-oxygen and the 4’-carbon atoms with a methylene unit. Oligonucleotides containing LNA exhibit unprecedented thermal stabilities towards complementary DNA and RNA2, which allows excellent mismatch discrimination. In fact the high binding affinity of LNA oligos allows for the use of short probes in, for example, SNP genotyping3, allele specific PCR and mRNA sample preparation. In fact, LNA is recommended for use in any hybridization assay that requires high specificity and/or reproducibility, e.g., dual labelled probes, in situ hybridization probes, molecular beacons and PCR primers. Furthermore, LNA offers the possibility to adjust Tm values of primers and probes in multiplex assays. As a result of these significant characteristics, the use of LNA-modified oligos in antisense drug development is now coming under investigation4, and recently the therapeutic potential of LNA has been reviewed.5 LNA can be mixed with DNA and RNA, as well as other nucleic acid analogues, modifiers and labels. LNA oligonucleotides are water soluble, and can be separated by gel electrophoresis and precipitated by ethanol.
Details
Usage
- Coupling: 3 minute coupling time recommended. Increase oxidation time 3 fold for optimal performance.
- Deprotection: No changes needed from standard method recommended by synthesizer manufacturer.
Specifications | |
---|---|
Diluent | Anhydrous Acetonitrile |
Storage | Freezer storage, -10 to -30�C, dry |
Stability | 2-3 days |
Dilution/Coupling Data
The table below show pack size data and, for solutions, dilution and approximate coupling based on normal priming procedures.
ABI 392/394
Catalog # | Pack Size | Grams/Pack | 0.1M Dil. (mL) | Approximate Number of Additions | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LV40 | LV200 | 40nm | 0.2μm | 1μm | 10μm | ||||
10-2030-05 | 0.5 g | 0.5 | 6.47 | 202.33 | 121.4 | 75.88 | 55.18 | 40.47 | 10.12 |
10-2030-10 | 1.0 g | 1 | 12.94 | 418 | 250.8 | 156.75 | 114 | 83.6 | 20.9 |
Expedite
Catalog # | Pack Size | Grams/Pack | Dilution (mL) | Approximate Number of Additions | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Molarity | 50nm | 0.2μm | 1μm | 15μm | ||||
10-2030-05 | 0.5 g | 0.5 | 9.66 | 0.07 | 186.8 | 116.75 | 84.91 | 11.68 |
10-2030-10 | 1.0 g | 1 | 19.31 | 0.07 | 379.8 | 237.38 | 172.64 | 23.74 |
References
(1a)A.A. Koshkin, S.K. Singh, P. Nielsen, V.K. Rajwanshi, R. Kumar, M. Meldgaard, C.E. Olsen, and J. Wengel, Tetrahedron,1998, 54, 3607-3630.(1b) S.K. Singh, P. Nielsen, A.A. Koshkin, and J. Wengel, Chem. Comm., 1998, (4), 455-456. (2) L. Kværnø and J. Wengel, Chem. Comm., 1999, (7), 657-658.(3) P. Mouritzen, A.T. Nielsen, H.M. Pfundheller, Y. Choleva, L. Kongsbak, and S. Møller, Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 2003, 3(1), 27-38.(4a)J. Kurreck, E. Wyszko, C. Gillen, and V.A. Erdmann, Nucleic Acids Res., 2002, 30, 1911-1918. (4b)H. Ørum and J. Wengel, Curr. Opinion in Mol. Therap., 2001, 3, 239-243.(5a)M. Petersen and J. Wengel, Trends in Biotechnology, 2003, 21(2), 74-81. (5b)D.A. Braasch, D.R. Corey, Biochemistry, 2002, 41, 4503-4510.
ebiomall.com






>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
名称:氨氧基乙酸盐;羧甲氧基胺半盐酸盐;
分子式:C2H5NO3·0.5HCl
分子质量:109.30
熔点:156℃
果糖胺是血浆中的蛋白质与葡萄糖非酶糖化过程中形成的高分子酮胺结构类似果糖胺的物质,它的浓度与血糖水平成正相关,并相对保持稳定。它的测定却不受血糖的影响。由于血浆蛋白的半衰期为17~20天,故果糖胺可以反映糖尿病患者检测前1~3周内的平均血糖水平。从一定程度上弥补了糖化血红蛋白不能反映较短时期内血糖浓度变化的不足。果糖胺的测定快速而价廉(化学法),是评价糖尿病控制情况的一个良好指标,尤其是对血糖波动较大的脆性糖尿病及妊娠糖尿病,了解其平均血糖水平有实际意义。但果糖胺不受每次进食的影响,所以不能用来直接指导每日胰岛素及口服降糖药的用量。血清果糖胺正常值为1.64~2.64mmol/L,血浆中果糖胺较血清低0.3mmol/L。
【认领须知】
1、认领翻译的战友请跟帖注明“认领本文翻译,48小时内未完成,请其他战友认领!”
2、请根据自己专业背景选择认领,如使用翻译软件翻译,被发现者扣分1-2分
3、经常认领而不能及时提供优质稿件者将被列入黑名单,取消认领资格,请大家注意!
4、翻译时请参照版规:点击查看互
5、在首位认领战友未超过规定时间的其他任何认领属违规认领,将不会给予丁当或加分!
6、翻译完成后加分(或丁当)的时限为三日,请耐心等待,若超过时限未加者可进行申诉:点击进入
7、本文题目仅供译者参考,篇幅较长者可申请适当延时
8、翻译前请查一下有无重复帖
9、为保证翻译质量,每人每天最多只能认领两篇
10、链接:http://www.ascopost.com/News/57763
ICML2017:PhaseIIIbMAGNIFYStudyofLenalidomideandRituximabCombinationinRelapsed/RefractoryFollicularandMarginalZoneLymphoma
AninterimanalysisofMAGNIFY,aphaseIIIb,randomized,open-label,multicenterstudyoftheR2combinationregimen(lenalidomide[Revlimid]plusrituximab[Rituxan])inpatientswithrelapsedorrefractorymarginalzonelymphoma,waspresentedattheInternationalConferenceonMalignantLymphoma(ICML)inLugano,Switzerland.ThisanalysisexpandedupondatapresentedearlierinthemonthattheASCOAnnualMeeting(Abstract7502).
TheMAGNIFYstudycontinuestoevaluatetheclinicalactivityof12cyclesofR2combinationtherapyfollowedbyrandomizationtoeither18cyclesofR2maintenanceor18cyclesofrituximabmonotherapy,inpatientswithrelapsedorrefractoryfollicularlymphoma,marginalzonelymphoma,ormantlecelllymphoma.Approximately500patientsareplannedtobeenrolledinthestudy.
Theprimaryendpointisprogression-freesurvival.Secondaryendpointsincludeoverallsurvival,overallresponserate,completeresponse,improvementofresponse,durationofresponse,durationofcompleteresponse,timetonextlymphomatreatment,timetohistologictransformation,safety,andexploratoryquality-of-lifemeasures.EnrollmentintheMAGNIFYstudyisongoing.
ASCOData
AttheASCOAnnualMeeting,interimdatawerepresentedfromananalysisofasubsetofpatientsfromtheMAGNIFYstudywithrelapsedorrefractoryfollicularlymphoma(n=160)withearly-relapse(n=52)anddouble-refractory(n=50)disease.
AttheJanuary9,2017,datacutoff,the1-yearprogression-freesurvivalforallfollicularlymphomapatientswas70%,with65%fordouble-refractorypatientsand49%forearly-relapsepatients.Additionally,evaluablefollicularlymphomapatients(n=128)hadanoverallresponserateof66%withacompleteresponse/completeresponse–unconfirmedrateof38%.Fordouble-refractorypatients(n=42),overallresponseratewas45%withacompleteresponse/completeresponse–unconfirmedrateof21%andforearly-relapsepatients(n=43),overallresponseratewas47%withacompleteresponse/completeresponse–unconfirmedrateof21%.Mediandurationofresponsewasnotmetatamedianfollow-upof10.2months.
Themostcommongrade3or4adverseeventsobservedinthestudyforallfollicularlymphoma,double-refractory,andearly-relapsepatients,respectively,wereneutropenia(29%,42%,37%),fatigue(6%,4%,8%),leukopenia(5%,8%,10%),thrombocytopenia(4%,8%,4%),andlymphopenia(3%,6%,4%).
ICMLData
DatapresentedatICMLinaseparateanalysisfocusedonpatientswithmarginalzonelymphoma(n=38),includingnodalmarginalzonelymphoma(n=18),splenicmarginalzonelymphoma(n=10),andmucosa-associatedlymphoidtissuelymphoma(n=10).
Atamedianfollow-upof13.8monthsfrominitiationoftherapywiththeR2combination,evaluablepatientswithmarginalzonelymphoma(n=32)achievedanoverallresponserateof66%withacompleteresponse/completeresponse–unconfirmedrateof44%.Evaluablenodalmarginalzonelymphomapatients(n=14)hadanoverallresponserateof57%withacompleteresponse/completeresponse–unconfirmedrateof57%.Evaluablesplenicmarginalzonelymphomapatients(n=8)hadanoverallresponserateof63%withacompleteresponserateof25%;andevaluablemucosa-associatedlymphoidtissuelymphomapatients(n=10)hadanoverallresponserateof80%withacompleteresponse/completeresponse–unconfirmedrateof40%.Mediandurationofresponsewasnotreachedforanygroup.
Themostcommongrade3or4adverseeventsobservedinpatientswithmarginalzonelymphomawereneutropenia(32%),thrombocytopenia(16%),andleukopenia(11%).
“Thechemotherapy-freecombinationoflenalidomideandrituximab,withcomplementarymechanismsofactionthatarethoughttoenhanceantibodydependentcellularcytotoxicity,continuestoshowencouragingactivityandatolerablesafetyprofileinindolentlymphomas,andparticularlyindifficult-to-treatpatientsubsets,”saidDavidJ.Andorsky,MD,co–principalinvestigatorofthestudyandmedicaloncologistattheRockyMountainCancerCentersinBoulder,Colorado.“Theseresultsinpatientswhohadfailedmultipletherapiesorrelapsedearly,aswellastheactivityinmarginalzonepatientsmeritfurtherstudyinthisareaofindolentlymphoma.”
AboutMAGNIFY
MAGNIFYisaphaseIIIb,multicenter,open-labelstudyofpatientswithgrades1–3bortransformedfollicularlymphoma,marginalzonelymphoma,ormantlecelllymphomawhoreceivedatleast1priortherapyandhadstageI–IV,measurabledisease.Approximately500patientsareplannedforenrollmentin12cyclesofR2induction,withaprojected314patientswithatleaststablediseaseafterinductionrandomized(1:1)to2maintenancearms.
Inductionincludesorallenalidomideat20mg/d,days1–21per28-daycycle(d1–21/28)plusintravenousrituximabat375mg/m2,days1,8,15,and22ofcycle1andday1ofcycles3,5,7,9,and11(28-daycycles).Patientsarethenrandomizedtomaintenancelenalidomideat10mg/d,days1to21/28,cycles13to30,plusrituximabat375mg/m2,day1ofcycles13,15,17,19,21,23,25,27,and29(R2,armA),orrituximabalone(sameschedule,armB).PatientsreceivingR2maintenanceafter18cyclesmaycontinuemaintenancelenalidomidemonotherapyat10mg/d,days1–21/28(perpatientand/orinvestigatordiscretion),untildiseaseprogressionastolerated.Patientswillbefollowedfor≥5yearsafterthelastpatientinitiatesinductiontherapy.

