AC220 (Quizartinib) is an orally-available, imidazobenzothiazole-based inhibitor of Flt3, with an in vitro Kd of 2 nM. In vitro cell studies show that AC220 has a IC50 of 0.5 nM for MV-411 cells. [1] In a variety of leukemic cell lines, AC220 inhibited Flt3 phosphorylation of MV4-11, MOLM-14, SEM-K2, and RS4-11 at IC50s of 1, 2, 4, and 4 nM, respectively. Furthermore, inhibition of cell proliferation on these same lines were measured as 0.3, 0.1, 0.4, and >10000 nM, respectively. [2]In a KinomeScan panel of 402 kinases, AC220 has a high degree of specificity toward Flt3 with only mild inhibition of closely related RTKs such as KIT, PDGFR, RET, VEGFR2. [3]Ina Flt3-ITD acute myeloid leukemia mouse model, AC220 was shown to extend significantly the survival at 1 mg/kg QD dosing, and eradicates tumors in a Flt3-dependent mouse xenograft model at 10 mg/kg. [3]
Technical information:
| Chemical Formula: | C29H32N6O4S | |
| CAS #: | 950769-58-1 | |
| Molecular Weight: | 560.67 | |
| Purity: | > 98% | |
| Appearance: | White solid | |
| Chemical Name: | Urea, N-[5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-isoxazolyl]-N"-[4-[7-[2-(4-morpholinyl)ethoxy]imidazo[2,1-b]benzothiazol-2-yl]phenyl]- | |
| Solubility: | Up to 100mM in DMSO | |
| Synonyms: | AC-220, AC220, Quizartinib |
Shipping Condition: The product is shipped in a glass vial at ambient temperature.Storage condition: For longer shelf life, store solid powder at 4oC desiccated, or store DMSO solution at -20oC.
Reference:
| 1. | Belli et al., AC220, a uniquely potent and selective FLT3 inhibitor, enhances the cytotoxiceffects of chemotherapeutic agents in cell culture and in mouse tumor xenografts. Ambit Biosciences ASH Poster, 2009, Abstract 2052. |
| 2. | Gunawardane et al., INHIBITION OF FLT3 SIGNALING BOTH IN VITRO AND IN VIVO BY AC220, A SECOND GENERATION POTENT AND SELECTIVE FLT3 INHIBITOR. Ambit Biosciences AACR Poster, 2010, Abstract 3619. |
| 3. | Zarrinkar et al., AC220 is a uniquely potent and selective inhibitor of FLT3 for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Blood 2009, 114(14), 2984-2992. Pubmed ID:19654408 |
Other Information:
Product Specification (pdf) MSDS (pdf) Certificate of Analysis is available upon request.
ebiomall.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
、
Cell-Based ELISA
的优点:
Cell-Based ELISA
(基于细胞的
ELISA
)是一种全新的
ELISA
技术,有两个最突出的优点:
1.1
不需要抽提蛋白、包被微孔板:细胞直接在微孔板里培养,待检测的时候,将细胞固定在微孔板上并
进行通透处理即可。这样就避免了抽提蛋白时,由于客观和主观上引起样品的损失而导致实验结果在一定
程度上偏离了实际情况。
同时不用包被微孔板,
简化了实验流程,
有助于提高效率。
科研人员在一个
96
孔
酶联板上,便能检测目标细胞蛋白经刺激或抑制作用后的表现。由于省去抽提蛋白和裂解细胞的步骤,样
本的损失也能降到最低,比起其他普通的
ELISA
测定方法,这项全新的
ELISA
技术能更快速、更方便
地一次检测大量的细胞内蛋白。
1.2
可同时检测两种不同蛋白:
封闭后加入两种抗不同蛋白且来源于不同宿主的一抗,
然后再加入不同的
二抗,加入两种荧光底物,检测两个波长。同时检测两种蛋白的好处是显而易见的,可以减少工作量,此
外还可以满足一些特殊的实验需要,例如,需要测定某个蛋白的磷酸化比例,就需要测定磷酸化蛋白的数
量和总蛋白的数量,这两个测定在同一次实验进行,有助于消除实验误差,得到更为精确的实验结果。
2
、
Cell-Based ELISA
的两种技术:
某些公司发展了双通道
Cell-Based ELISA
技术;
双通道与单通道
Cell-based ELISA
比较:
双通道
cell-based ELISA
,顾名思义,即一次可以同时检测两种目的蛋白,
R&D Systems
提供的
Cell-based ELISA
就是双通道
cell-based ELISA
,原理略:(需要荧光检测方式和相应仪器);
单通道
cell-based ELISA
,即一次只能检测一种目的蛋白,他和普通
ELISA
的主要区别在于样品处理过
程
3
、
cell-based ELISA
的应用:
该产品,最多发展起来的是用于检测磷酸化和非磷酸化蛋白的相对含量;
4
、有
cell-based ELISA
产品的公司:目前,多家
elisa
产品提供
商均
提供
cell
based
elisa
试剂盒,
如
Rnd
systems
,
raybiotech
,
ebioscience
,
millipore
等公司;
5
、如何自己进行
cell based elisa
实验?
事实上,根据单通道的
cell based elisa
原理,可以自己建立
cell based elisa
实验系统;
细胞加入培养板中;
加入刺激物或者抑制剂进行培养;
对细胞进行固定或者封闭;
加入第一抗体;
加入
HRP
结合的二抗(二抗的选择,同
western blot
);
加入底物进行显色;
我做的是细胞因子的刺激和抑制某条通路后观察是否有影响,分组为空白组,空白+抑制剂,刺激组,刺激+抑制剂,最开始用的单因素方差分析,LSD-T和SNK-Q检验,但是同学说我这里面有两个处理因素,所以不能单因素方差分析,应该直接空白和空白+抑制,空白和刺激,刺激和刺激+抑制剂进行独立样本T检验,现在脑子是混乱的,拜托园子里的大神们帮我看看,感激不尽!!
支原体培养则是取样后在培养基上培养,看有多少支原体菌落会长出,是比较直观和可信的结果。
总体来讲,这两种检查手段可信度都较高,结合一起,不仅可以可靠的知道有无解脲支原体感染,还能知道感染是否严重。
认领翻译的战友请跟帖注明“认领本文翻译,48小时内未完成,请其他站友认领”
MaggotsFasterThanScalpelinWoundDebridement
December19,2011—Maggotdebridementtherapy(MDT)appearstobemoreeffectiveforwounddebridementcomparedwithconventionaltherapy,butonlyat1week;afterthattime,anothertypeofdressingshouldbeused,newresearchsuggests.
KristinaOpletalovà,MD,fromtheDepartmentofDermatology,UniversityofCaen,France,andcolleaguespublishedonlineDecember19intheArchivesofDermatology.
MedicalmaggotswereapprovedbytheUSFoodandDrugAdmiNISTrationasamedicaldeviceforwounddebridementin2004.Accordingtotheresearchers,useofmaggotsintreatingwoundsisassociatedwitheffectivewounddebridement,antibacterialeffects,andstimulationofwoundhealing.
However,theypointout,"[r]elativelyfewclinicalstudieshavebeenconductedandtheresultsarenotclear,partlyowingtomethodologicassessmentproblems."
InthecurrentProspective,randomizedcontrolled,phase3clinicaltrial,theresearcherssoughttodeterminetheefficacyofbaggedlarvaeonwounddebridementincomparisonwithconventionaltreatment.
TheprimaryobjectivewastocomparethemeanpercentageofsloughinwoundstreatedwithMDTwiththatofconventionaltreatmentatday15.Thestudyincluded119patientswithanonhealing,sloughywoundthatwas40cm2orsmallerandlessthan2cmdeep.Patientsalsohadananklebrachialindexof0.8orhigher.
Treatmentwasadministeredduringa2-weekhospitalstay.Conventionaltreatmentconsistedofsurgicaldebridement3timesaweekwithascalpel,withuseoftopicalanesthesia.TheMDTwasadministeredusinganencloseddressing(Vitapad,BioMondeLaboratories)containing80sterilemaggots.Atdischarge,aconventionaldressingwasapplied,andpatientswerefollowed-upatday30.
DebridementbyMDTwassignificantlyfasterthansurgicaldebridementduringthefirstweekoftreatment,reachingthesamelevelthecontrolgroupreachedatday15.NobenefitforMDTcomparedwithconventionaltreatmentinhealingrateswasobserved.Atday8,54.5%intheMDTgroupvs66.5%inthecontrolgroup(P=.04)hadevidenceofsloughandwoundhealing.However,byday15,themeanpercentageofsloughwas55.4%intheMDTgroupand53.8%inthecontrolgroup(P=.78).
"AthoughMDTshowsnosignificantbenefitatday15comparedwithconventionaltreatment,debridementbyMDTissignificantlyfasterandoccursduringthefirstweekoftreatment,"theresearchersconclude."Becausethereisnobenefitincontinuingthetreatmentafter1week,anothertypeofdressingshouldbeusedafter2or3applicationsofMDT."
Painscoresweresimilarandmildinbothgroups,althoughincontrasttoconventionaltreatment,MDTwasperformedwithouttopicalanesthesia.
Accordingtotheresearchers,noneofthepatientswerereticentaboutundergoingMDT."[A]crawlingsensationonthewoundwasrarelyandalmostequallynotedinbothgroups,revealingthatthesensationwassubjective,"Dr.Opletalovàandcolleaguespointout.
TwoquestionsregardingMDTremainunanswered,theauthorsnote."Candebridementbeimprovedusingmoremaggotsperdressing?Ifso,wouldthesedressingsbemorepainful?Furtherstudiesareneededtoanswerthesequestions."
ThestudywassupportedbygrantsfromtheClinicalResearchHospitalProgramandfromtheFrenchSocietyofDermatology.Theauthorshavedisclosednorelevantfinancialrelationships.

