
Dapagliflozin (BMS-512148) is an orally-available C-aryl glucoside diphenylmethanol inhibitor of SGLT2 (IC50 1.1 nM) for the treatment of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. It is the first approved SGLT2 inhibitor (European Union as Forxiga) for the treatment of diabetes. Its excellent selectivity over SGLT1 (IC50 1390 nM) ensures that it does not interfere with intestinal glucose absorption. Dapagliflozin minimally inhibits glucose transporters GLUT1 and GLUT2 and modestly inhibits GLUT4. [1]Dapagliflozin removes excess glucose and its associated calories in urine, which in turn reduces blood sugar levels. Clinical studies have shown concurrent reductions in weight and blood pressure. [2] In combination with metformin, the weight loss was statistically significant, dose-dependent, and persisted for over two years. [3]
Technical information:
Chemical Formula: | C21H25ClO6 | |
CAS #: | 461432-26-8 | |
Molecular Weight: | 408.87 | |
Purity: | >98% | |
Appearance: | White | |
Chemical Name: | (2S,3R,4R,5S,6R)-2-(3-(4-ethoxybenzyl)-4-chlorophenyl)-6-(hydroxymethyl)-tetrahydro-2H-pyran-3,4,5-triol | |
Solubility: | Up to 100 mM in DMSO | |
Synonyms: | BMS-512148, BMS 512148, BMS512148, Dapagliflozin |
Shipping Condition: The product is shipped in a glass vial at ambient temperature.Storage condition: For longer shelf life, store solid powder at 4oC desiccated, or store DMSO solution at -20oC.
Reference:
1. | Shah et al., Dapagliflozin: a novel sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitor for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pharmacotherapy 2012, 32(1), 80-94. Pubmed ID:22392830 |
2. | AstraZeneca website: http://www.astrazeneca.com/Media/Press-releases/Article/20121114--forxiga-eu-approval-type-2-diabetes |
3. | Chao et al., Dapagliflozin: an evidence-based review of its potential in the treatment of type-2 diabetes. Core Evidence 2012, 7, 21-28. Pubmed ID:22701099 |
Other Information:
Product Specification (pdf) MSDS (pdf) Certificate of Analysis is available upon request.
ebiomall.com






>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
RMgX + RX = R-R + MgX2.
这个反应需要的能量比生成格氏试剂的高,
因此降低反应温度是第一个选择。
其次, 增加镁得摩尔比, 让 RX与镁有更多机会反应, 而不是与RMgX。
第三, 降低RX的浓度, 即用更多的溶剂, 因为溶剂和格氏试剂有很显著的溶剂络合。
第四, 缓慢滴加RX., 即降低RX.在反应体系的浓度。
第五, 增加搅拌速率, 即, 让RX.与镁有更好的接触。
认领翻译的战友请跟帖注明“认领本文翻译,48小时内未完成,请其他站友认领”
MaggotsFasterThanScalpelinWoundDebridement
December19,2011—Maggotdebridementtherapy(MDT)appearstobemoreeffectiveforwounddebridementcomparedwithconventionaltherapy,butonlyat1week;afterthattime,anothertypeofdressingshouldbeused,newresearchsuggests.
KristinaOpletalovà,MD,fromtheDepartmentofDermatology,UniversityofCaen,France,andcolleaguespublishedonlineDecember19intheArchivesofDermatology.
MedicalmaggotswereapprovedbytheUSFoodandDrugAdmiNISTrationasamedicaldeviceforwounddebridementin2004.Accordingtotheresearchers,useofmaggotsintreatingwoundsisassociatedwitheffectivewounddebridement,antibacterialeffects,andstimulationofwoundhealing.
However,theypointout,"[r]elativelyfewclinicalstudieshavebeenconductedandtheresultsarenotclear,partlyowingtomethodologicassessmentproblems."
InthecurrentProspective,randomizedcontrolled,phase3clinicaltrial,theresearcherssoughttodeterminetheefficacyofbaggedlarvaeonwounddebridementincomparisonwithconventionaltreatment.
TheprimaryobjectivewastocomparethemeanpercentageofsloughinwoundstreatedwithMDTwiththatofconventionaltreatmentatday15.Thestudyincluded119patientswithanonhealing,sloughywoundthatwas40cm2orsmallerandlessthan2cmdeep.Patientsalsohadananklebrachialindexof0.8orhigher.
Treatmentwasadministeredduringa2-weekhospitalstay.Conventionaltreatmentconsistedofsurgicaldebridement3timesaweekwithascalpel,withuseoftopicalanesthesia.TheMDTwasadministeredusinganencloseddressing(Vitapad,BioMondeLaboratories)containing80sterilemaggots.Atdischarge,aconventionaldressingwasapplied,andpatientswerefollowed-upatday30.
DebridementbyMDTwassignificantlyfasterthansurgicaldebridementduringthefirstweekoftreatment,reachingthesamelevelthecontrolgroupreachedatday15.NobenefitforMDTcomparedwithconventionaltreatmentinhealingrateswasobserved.Atday8,54.5%intheMDTgroupvs66.5%inthecontrolgroup(P=.04)hadevidenceofsloughandwoundhealing.However,byday15,themeanpercentageofsloughwas55.4%intheMDTgroupand53.8%inthecontrolgroup(P=.78).
"AthoughMDTshowsnosignificantbenefitatday15comparedwithconventionaltreatment,debridementbyMDTissignificantlyfasterandoccursduringthefirstweekoftreatment,"theresearchersconclude."Becausethereisnobenefitincontinuingthetreatmentafter1week,anothertypeofdressingshouldbeusedafter2or3applicationsofMDT."
Painscoresweresimilarandmildinbothgroups,althoughincontrasttoconventionaltreatment,MDTwasperformedwithouttopicalanesthesia.
Accordingtotheresearchers,noneofthepatientswerereticentaboutundergoingMDT."[A]crawlingsensationonthewoundwasrarelyandalmostequallynotedinbothgroups,revealingthatthesensationwassubjective,"Dr.Opletalovàandcolleaguespointout.
TwoquestionsregardingMDTremainunanswered,theauthorsnote."Candebridementbeimprovedusingmoremaggotsperdressing?Ifso,wouldthesedressingsbemorepainful?Furtherstudiesareneededtoanswerthesequestions."
ThestudywassupportedbygrantsfromtheClinicalResearchHospitalProgramandfromtheFrenchSocietyofDermatology.Theauthorshavedisclosednorelevantfinancialrelationships.
支原体培养则是取样后在培养基上培养,看有多少支原体菌落会长出,是比较直观和可信的结果。
总体来讲,这两种检查手段可信度都较高,结合一起,不仅可以可靠的知道有无解脲支原体感染,还能知道感染是否严重。

