| Molecular Weight: | 500.61 |
| Formula: | C27H32N8O2 |
| Purity: | ≥98% |
| CAS#: | 955365-80-7 |
| Solubility: | DMSO up to 100 mM |
| Chemical Name: | 2-allyl-1-(6-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)pyridin-2-yl)-6-((4-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)phenyl)amino)-1,2-dihydro-3H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-3-one |
| Storage: | Powder:4oC 1 year. DMSO:4oC3 month;-20oC 1 year. |
Biological Activity:MK-1775 (AZD1775) is a highly potent, selective and orally bioavailable Wee1 kinase inhibitor with IC50 of 5.2 nM. It abrogated DNA damaged checkpoints induced by gemcitabine, carboplatin, and cisplatin etc. and enhanced the anti-tumor efficacy of these agents selectively in p53-deficient tumor cells. At tolerated doses, MK-1775 treatment leads to xenograft tumor growth inhibition or regression. It inhibits Wee1 in H3K36me3-deficient cells results in RRM2 reduction, critical dNTP depletion, S-phase arrest, and apoptosis. MK-1775 can regresse H3K36me3-deficient tumor xenografts too. Right now MK-1775 is in phase I/II clinical trials for various cancers. How to Use:In vitro:MK-1775 was used at 1 µM in vitro and cellular assays. In vivo: MK-1775 was orally dosed to mice at 20 mg/Kg once per day. Reference:
- 1.Hirai H, et al. Small-molecule inhibition of Wee1 kinase by MK-1775 selectively sensitizes p53-deficient tumor cells to DNA-damaging agents. (2009) Mol Cancer Ther. 8(11):2992-3000.
- 2.Rajeshkumar NV, et al. MK-1775, a potent Wee1 inhibitor, synergizes with gemcitabine to achieve tumor regressions, selectively in p53-deficient pancreatic cancer xenografts. (2011) Clin Cancer Res. 17(9):2799-806.
- 3.Guertin AD, et al. Preclinical evaluation of the WEE1 inhibitor MK-1775 as single-agent anticancer therapy. (2013) Mol Cancer Ther. 12(8):1442-52.
- 4.Pfister SX, et al. Inhibiting WEE1 Selectively Kills Histone H3K36me3-Deficient Cancers by dNTP Starvation. (2015) Cancer Cell. 28(5):557-68.
MK-1775_spec.pdf
MK-1775_MSDS.pdfProducts are for research use only. Not for human use.ebiomall.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
、
Cell-Based ELISA
的优点:
Cell-Based ELISA
(基于细胞的
ELISA
)是一种全新的
ELISA
技术,有两个最突出的优点:
1.1
不需要抽提蛋白、包被微孔板:细胞直接在微孔板里培养,待检测的时候,将细胞固定在微孔板上并
进行通透处理即可。这样就避免了抽提蛋白时,由于客观和主观上引起样品的损失而导致实验结果在一定
程度上偏离了实际情况。
同时不用包被微孔板,
简化了实验流程,
有助于提高效率。
科研人员在一个
96
孔
酶联板上,便能检测目标细胞蛋白经刺激或抑制作用后的表现。由于省去抽提蛋白和裂解细胞的步骤,样
本的损失也能降到最低,比起其他普通的
ELISA
测定方法,这项全新的
ELISA
技术能更快速、更方便
地一次检测大量的细胞内蛋白。
1.2
可同时检测两种不同蛋白:
封闭后加入两种抗不同蛋白且来源于不同宿主的一抗,
然后再加入不同的
二抗,加入两种荧光底物,检测两个波长。同时检测两种蛋白的好处是显而易见的,可以减少工作量,此
外还可以满足一些特殊的实验需要,例如,需要测定某个蛋白的磷酸化比例,就需要测定磷酸化蛋白的数
量和总蛋白的数量,这两个测定在同一次实验进行,有助于消除实验误差,得到更为精确的实验结果。
2
、
Cell-Based ELISA
的两种技术:
某些公司发展了双通道
Cell-Based ELISA
技术;
双通道与单通道
Cell-based ELISA
比较:
双通道
cell-based ELISA
,顾名思义,即一次可以同时检测两种目的蛋白,
R&D Systems
提供的
Cell-based ELISA
就是双通道
cell-based ELISA
,原理略:(需要荧光检测方式和相应仪器);
单通道
cell-based ELISA
,即一次只能检测一种目的蛋白,他和普通
ELISA
的主要区别在于样品处理过
程
3
、
cell-based ELISA
的应用:
该产品,最多发展起来的是用于检测磷酸化和非磷酸化蛋白的相对含量;
4
、有
cell-based ELISA
产品的公司:目前,多家
elisa
产品提供
商均
提供
cell
based
elisa
试剂盒,
如
Rnd
systems
,
raybiotech
,
ebioscience
,
millipore
等公司;
5
、如何自己进行
cell based elisa
实验?
事实上,根据单通道的
cell based elisa
原理,可以自己建立
cell based elisa
实验系统;
细胞加入培养板中;
加入刺激物或者抑制剂进行培养;
对细胞进行固定或者封闭;
加入第一抗体;
加入
HRP
结合的二抗(二抗的选择,同
western blot
);
加入底物进行显色;
我做的是细胞因子的刺激和抑制某条通路后观察是否有影响,分组为空白组,空白+抑制剂,刺激组,刺激+抑制剂,最开始用的单因素方差分析,LSD-T和SNK-Q检验,但是同学说我这里面有两个处理因素,所以不能单因素方差分析,应该直接空白和空白+抑制,空白和刺激,刺激和刺激+抑制剂进行独立样本T检验,现在脑子是混乱的,拜托园子里的大神们帮我看看,感激不尽!!
支原体培养则是取样后在培养基上培养,看有多少支原体菌落会长出,是比较直观和可信的结果。
总体来讲,这两种检查手段可信度都较高,结合一起,不仅可以可靠的知道有无解脲支原体感染,还能知道感染是否严重。
认领翻译的战友请跟帖注明“认领本文翻译,48小时内未完成,请其他站友认领”
MaggotsFasterThanScalpelinWoundDebridement
December19,2011—Maggotdebridementtherapy(MDT)appearstobemoreeffectiveforwounddebridementcomparedwithconventionaltherapy,butonlyat1week;afterthattime,anothertypeofdressingshouldbeused,newresearchsuggests.
KristinaOpletalovà,MD,fromtheDepartmentofDermatology,UniversityofCaen,France,andcolleaguespublishedonlineDecember19intheArchivesofDermatology.
MedicalmaggotswereapprovedbytheUSFoodandDrugAdmiNISTrationasamedicaldeviceforwounddebridementin2004.Accordingtotheresearchers,useofmaggotsintreatingwoundsisassociatedwitheffectivewounddebridement,antibacterialeffects,andstimulationofwoundhealing.
However,theypointout,"[r]elativelyfewclinicalstudieshavebeenconductedandtheresultsarenotclear,partlyowingtomethodologicassessmentproblems."
InthecurrentProspective,randomizedcontrolled,phase3clinicaltrial,theresearcherssoughttodeterminetheefficacyofbaggedlarvaeonwounddebridementincomparisonwithconventionaltreatment.
TheprimaryobjectivewastocomparethemeanpercentageofsloughinwoundstreatedwithMDTwiththatofconventionaltreatmentatday15.Thestudyincluded119patientswithanonhealing,sloughywoundthatwas40cm2orsmallerandlessthan2cmdeep.Patientsalsohadananklebrachialindexof0.8orhigher.
Treatmentwasadministeredduringa2-weekhospitalstay.Conventionaltreatmentconsistedofsurgicaldebridement3timesaweekwithascalpel,withuseoftopicalanesthesia.TheMDTwasadministeredusinganencloseddressing(Vitapad,BioMondeLaboratories)containing80sterilemaggots.Atdischarge,aconventionaldressingwasapplied,andpatientswerefollowed-upatday30.
DebridementbyMDTwassignificantlyfasterthansurgicaldebridementduringthefirstweekoftreatment,reachingthesamelevelthecontrolgroupreachedatday15.NobenefitforMDTcomparedwithconventionaltreatmentinhealingrateswasobserved.Atday8,54.5%intheMDTgroupvs66.5%inthecontrolgroup(P=.04)hadevidenceofsloughandwoundhealing.However,byday15,themeanpercentageofsloughwas55.4%intheMDTgroupand53.8%inthecontrolgroup(P=.78).
"AthoughMDTshowsnosignificantbenefitatday15comparedwithconventionaltreatment,debridementbyMDTissignificantlyfasterandoccursduringthefirstweekoftreatment,"theresearchersconclude."Becausethereisnobenefitincontinuingthetreatmentafter1week,anothertypeofdressingshouldbeusedafter2or3applicationsofMDT."
Painscoresweresimilarandmildinbothgroups,althoughincontrasttoconventionaltreatment,MDTwasperformedwithouttopicalanesthesia.
Accordingtotheresearchers,noneofthepatientswerereticentaboutundergoingMDT."[A]crawlingsensationonthewoundwasrarelyandalmostequallynotedinbothgroups,revealingthatthesensationwassubjective,"Dr.Opletalovàandcolleaguespointout.
TwoquestionsregardingMDTremainunanswered,theauthorsnote."Candebridementbeimprovedusingmoremaggotsperdressing?Ifso,wouldthesedressingsbemorepainful?Furtherstudiesareneededtoanswerthesequestions."
ThestudywassupportedbygrantsfromtheClinicalResearchHospitalProgramandfromtheFrenchSocietyofDermatology.Theauthorshavedisclosednorelevantfinancialrelationships.

