
Jingzhaotoxin-III (ß-TRTX-Cj1α) has been isolated initially from the Chinese Tarantula spider Chilobrachys Jingzhaovenom. Jingzhaotoxin-III selectively inhibits the activation of the voltage-dependent sodium channel Nav1.5 in heart or cancer cells with an IC50value close to 350 nM. It is inactive on Nav1.2, Nav1.4, Nav1.6 and Nav1.7 and should therefore be considered as an interesting research tool to discriminate between sodium channel subtypes. Jingzhaotoxin-III binds onto receptor site 4 presumably located on DIIS3-S4 linker of Nav1.5 and supposedly blocks Nav1.5 through a different mechanism than ProTx-II and Huwentoxin IV. ß-TRTX-Cj1α is composed of 36 amino acid residues including 6 cysteines cross-linked according to a C1-C4, C2-C5 and C3-C6 pattern. Jingzhaotoxin-III also inhibits Kv2.1 channel with an IC50 of around 700 nM.
Fig 1: Representative effects of different Jinghzaotoxin III concentrations on the amplitude of INa. Jinghzaotoxin III was applied externally to the cell at the time and concentrations indicated on top. Inward sodium currents were triggered in human MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells by 30 ms-long voltage steps from -100 to -5 mV, from a holding potential of -100 mV. 1 step every 2 sec.
Description:
AA sequence: Asp-Gly-Glu-Cys4-Gly-Gly-Phe-Trp-Trp-Lys-Cys11-Gly-Arg-Gly-Lys-Pro-Pro-Cys18-Cys19-Lys-Gly-Tyr-Ala-Cys24-Ser-Lys-Thr-Trp-Gly-Trp-Cys31-Ala-Val-Glu-Ala-Pro-OH
Disulfide bonds: Cys4-Cys19, Cys11-Cys24, and Cys18-Cys31
Length (aa): 36
Formula: C174H241N47O46S6
Molecular Weight: 3919.53 Da
Appearance: White lyophilized solid
Solubility: aqueous buffer
CAS number: not available
Source: Synthetic
Purity rate:> 98%
Reference:
Analysis of the interaction of tarantula toxin jingzhaotoxin-III (β-TRTX-Cj1α) with the voltage sensor of Kv2.1 uncovers the molecular basis for cross-activities on Kv2.1 and Nav1.5 channels
Animal venoms contain a fascinating array of divergent peptide toxins that have cross-activities on different types of voltage-gated ion channels. However, the underlying mechanism remains poorly understood. Jingzhaotoxin-III (JZTX-III), a 36-residue peptide from the tarantula Chilobrachys jingzhao, is specific for Nav1.5 and Kv2.1 channels over the majority of other ion channel subtypes. JZTX-III traps the Nav1.5 DII voltage sensor at closed state by binding to the DIIS3-S4 linker. In this study, electrophysiological experiments showed that JZTX-III had no effect on five voltage-gated potassium channel subtypes (Kv1.4, Kv3.1, and Kv4.1-4.3), whereas it significantly inhibited Kv2.1 with an IC50 of 0.71 ± 0.01 μM. Mutagenesis and modeling data suggested that JZTX-III docks at the Kv2.1 voltage-sensor paddle. Alanine replacement of Phe274, Lys280, Ser281, Leu283, Gln284, and Val288 could decrease JZTX-III affinity by 7-, 9-, 34-, 12-, 9-, and 7-fold, respectively. Among them, S281 is the most crucial determinant, and the substitution with Thr only slightly reduced toxin sensitivity. In contrast, a single conversion of Ser281 to Ala, Phe, Ile, Val, or Glu increased the IC50 value by >34-fold. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis experiments indicated that the functional surface of JZTX-III bound to the Kv2.1 channel is composed of four hydrophobic residues (Trp8, Trp28, Trp30, and Val33) and three charged residues (Arg13, Lys15, and Glu34). The bioactive surfaces of JZTX-III interacting with Kv2.1 and Nav1.5 are only partially overlapping. These results strongly supported the hypothesis that animal toxins might use partially overlapping bioactive surfaces to target the voltage-sensor paddles of two different types of ion channels. Increasing our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of toxins interacting with voltage-gated sodium and potassium channels may provide new molecular insights into the design of more potent ion channel inhibitors.
Tao H., et al. (2013) Analysis of the interaction of tarantula toxin jingzhaotoxin-III (β-TRTX-Cj1α) with the voltage sensor of Kv2.1 uncovers the molecular basis for cross-activities on Kv2.1 and Nav1.5 channels. Biochemistry. PMID: 24044413
Molecular basis of the tarantula toxin jingzhaotoxin-III (Beta-TRTX-Cj1 alpha) interacting with voltage sensors in sodium channel subtype Nav1.5
With conserved structural scaffold and divergent electrophysiological functions, animal toxins are considered powerful tools for investigating the basic structure-function relationship of voltage-gated sodium channels. Jingzhaotoxin-III (β-TRTX-Cj1α) is a unique sodium channel gating modifier from the tarantula Chilobrachys jingzhao, because the toxin can selectively inhibit the activation of cardiac sodium channel but not neuronal subtypes. However, the molecular basis of JZTX-III interaction with sodium channels remains unknown. In this study, we showed that JZTX-III was efficiently expressed by the secretory pathway in yeast. Alanine-scanning analysis indicated that 2 acidic residues (Asp1, Glu3) and an exposed hydrophobic patch, formed by 4 Trp residues (residues 8, 9, 28 and 30), play important roles in the binding of JZTX-III to Nav1.5. JZTX-III docked to the Nav1.5 DIIS3-S4 linker. Mutations S799A, R800A, and L804A could additively reduce toxin sensitivity of Nav1.5. We also demonstrated that the unique Arg800, not emerging in other sodium channel subtypes, is responsible for JZTX-III selectively interacting with Nav1.5. The reverse mutation D816R in Nav1.7 greatly increased the sensitivity of the neuronal subtype to JZTX-III. Conversely, the mutation R800D in Nav1.5 decreased JZTX-III’s IC₅₀ by 72-fold. Therefore, our results indicated that JZTX-III is a site 4 toxin, but does not possess the same critical residues on sodium channels as other site 4 toxins. Our data also revealed the underlying mechanism for JZTX-III to be highly specific for the cardiac sodium channel.
Mingqiang Rong, et al. (2011) Molecular basis of the tarantula toxin jingzhaotoxin-III (Beta-TRTX-Cj1 alpha) interacting with voltage sensors in sodium channel subtype Nav1.5. FASEB J. PMID: 21665957
Jingzhaotoxin-III, a Novel Spider Toxin Inhibiting Activation of Voltage-gated Sodium Channel in Rat Cardiac Myocytes
We have isolated a cardiotoxin, denoted jingzhaotoxin-III (JZTX-III), from the venom of the Chinese spider Chilobrachys jingzhao. The toxin contains 36 residues stabilized by three intracellular disulfide bridges (I-IV, II-V, and III-VI), assigned by a chemical strategy of partial reduction and sequence analysis. Cloned and sequenced using 3′-rapid amplification of cDNA ends and 5′-rapid amplification of cDNA ends, the full-length cDNA encoded a 63-residue precursor of JZTX-III. Different from other spider peptides, it contains an uncommon endoproteolytic site (-X-Ser-) anterior to mature protein and the intervening regions of 5 residues, which is the smallest in spider toxin cDNAs identified to date. Under whole cell recording, JZTX-III showed no effects on voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs) or calcium channels in dorsal root ganglion neurons, whereas it significantly inhibited tetrodotoxin-resistant VGSCs with an IC(50) value of 0.38 microm in rat cardiac myocytes. Different from scorpion beta-toxins, it caused a 10-mV depolarizing shift in the channel activation threshold. The binding site for JZTX-III on VGSCs is further suggested to be site 4 with a simple competitive assay, which at 10 microm eliminated the slowing currents induced by Buthus martensi Karsch I (BMK-I, scorpion alpha-like toxin) completely. JZTX-III shows higher selectivity for VGSC isoforms than other spider toxins affecting VGSCs, and the toxin hopefully represents an important ligand for discriminating cardiac VGSC subtype.
Yucheng Xiao, et al. (2004) Jingzhaotoxin-III, a Novel Spider Toxin Inhibiting Activation of Voltage-gated Sodium Channel in Rat Cardiac Myocytes. JBC. PMID: 15084603
ebiomall.com






>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
因为是考察不同PH对药物的影响,样品又不好改变其PH值,这种情况怎么办?希望有经验的高手指教。
我的流动相是甲醇-水(90:10)
谢谢赐教!
请进子版按格式发贴,自行修改,谢谢。
两个CEX方法A和B测定同一单抗,结果碱性峰比例差不多,酸性峰比例相差约7%,相应主峰也差了7%左右。
具体来说,A方法酸性峰高,主峰低,碱性峰稍微低点;B方法酸性峰低,主峰高,碱性峰稍微高点;另外也做了CIEF,结果呢和A方法更接近。
仔细比较起来,AB两个方法的峰性和数量差不多,就不知道为什么会有这么大的差异。两个方法一个用的WCX柱-磷酸缓冲液,一个用SCX柱-MES缓冲液
大家帮我分析下:
1.两个方法哪个方法更准确,是以酸性峰高的为准还是什么?为什么?
2.这显著差异是由方法造成,具体原因是什么?柱子?
3.CIEF的结果和A方法更接近,是不是可以由此证明A方法更好或者CIEF的方法更好(因为CIEF更快更方便)?
欢迎讨论~
纠正下,A方法用的是Tosoh的柱子,B方法用的是SCX柱。TOSOH的柱子是7um的填料,10cm长。SCX是10um的填料。我本人TOSOH的阳离子柱子用的很少,这次信手用用,结果发现差异很大
那我现在就考虑,在以后方法开发过程中,除了通过流动相pH和组成、梯度、柱子选择来获得样品主峰和酸碱性的最大分离,还要关注各峰比例。因为之前比较方法好坏都只看分离度,尤其是主峰和邻近峰的分离度,获得最大分离度,自然可以做到主峰尽可能纯,但从未认真比较过各峰比例。这是一个大疏忽吧!
另外,CIEF和CEX方法原理还是有点差异的,所以分的是不同的异质体,原液放行两个方法肯定是都要做的。问题就是在早期细胞株筛选和工艺开发阶段,哪个方法才是又快又准。CIEF(iCE280)一般15分钟一个样,比CEX快多了。如果CIEF测得主峰要低于CEX结果,是不是真的完全可以取代CEX呢?CEX分离出的峰远比CIEF的多!
欢迎大家继续讨论~
1.直接用固体磷酸钠配制成50mM的磷酸钠溶液,再调pH到7.4;(我们试着用这个做了下,发现挂不上柱)
2.配置磷酸钠盐缓冲液:按NaH2PO4:Na2HPO4以19:81的摩尔比配制成pH7.4的缓冲液?(附一张百度出来的配方
)
3.如果是磷酸钠盐缓冲液,可以直接将50mM的NaH2PO4的水溶液用NaOH调成pH7.4吗?
再者,2和3这两个方法配制的磷酸钠盐缓冲液有什么区别?最终效果是一样的吗?如果不一样,有什么理论的知识支撑呢?个人感觉是分析化学中酸碱理论中的缓冲液那里的知识。求帮忙解答这些疑问。
另外,我还想问一下,pH对于Ni柱对His-tagged的蛋白的分离纯化影响大吗?是怎么影响的?谢谢大家了!
拼音名:Chunhuashui
英文名:PurifiedWater
【性状】本品为无色的澄清液体;无臭,无味。
【检查】酸碱度取本品10ml,加甲基红指示液2滴,不得显红色;另取10ml,加溴麝香草酚蓝指示液5滴,不得显蓝色。氯化物、流酸盐与钙盐取本品,分置三支试管中,每管各50ml。第一管中加硝酸5滴与硝酸银试液1ml,第二管中加氯化钡试液2ml,第三管中加草酸铵试液2ml,均不得发生浑浊。
硝酸盐取本品5ml置试管中,于冰浴中冷却,加10%氯化钾溶液0.4ml与0.1%二苯胺硫酸溶液0.1ml,摇匀,缓缓滴加硫酸5ml,摇匀,将试管子50℃水浴中放置15分钟,溶液产生的蓝色与标准硝酸盐溶液[取硝酸钾0.163g,加水溶解并稀释至100ml,摇匀,精密量取1ml,加水稀释成100ml,再精密量取10ml,加水稀释成100ml,摇匀,即得(每1ml相当于1pgNO3)0.3ml,加无硝酸盐的水4.7ml,用同一方法处理后的颜色比较,不得更深(0.000006%)。
亚硝酸盐取本品10ml,置纳氏管中,加对氨基苯磺酰胺的稀盐酸溶液(1→100)lml与盐酸菜乙H肢溶液(0.l+100)1ml,产生的粉红色,与标准亚硝酸盐溶液〔取亚硝酸钠0.750g(按干燥品计算),加水溶解,稀释至100ml,摇匀,精密量取1ml,加水稀释成100ml,摇匀,再精密量取1ml,加水稀释成50ml,摇匀,即得(每1ml相当于1μgNO2)]0.2ml,加无亚硝酸盐的水9.8ml,用同一方法处理后的颜色比较,不得更深(0.000002%)。
氨取本品50ml,加碱性碘化汞钾试液2ml,放置15分钟;如显色,与氯化铵溶液(取氯化铵31.5mg,加无氨水适量使溶解并稀释成1000ml)1.5ml,加元氨水48ml与碱性碘化汞钾试液2ml制成的对照液比较,不得更深(0.00003%)。
二氧化碳取本品25ml,置50ml具塞量筒中,加氢氧化钙试液25ml,密塞振摇,放置,小时内不得发生浑浊。
易氧化物取本品100ml,加稀硫酸10ml,煮沸后,加高锰酸钾滴定液(0.02mol/L)0.10ml,再煮沸10分钟,粉红色不得完全消失。
不挥发物取本品100ml,置105℃恒重的蒸发皿中,在水浴上蒸干,并在105℃干燥至恒重,遗留残渣不得过1mg。
重金属取本品50ml,加水18.5ml,蒸发至20ml,放冷,加醋酸盐缓冲液(pH3.5)2ml与水适量使成25ml,加硫代乙酰胺试液2ml,摇匀,放置2分钟,与标准铅溶液1.5ml加水18.5ml用同一方法处理后的颜色比较,不得更深(0.00003%)。
微生物限度取本品,采用薄膜过滤法处理后,依法检查(附录ⅪJ),细菌、霉菌和酵母菌总数每1ml不得过100个。
【贮藏】密闭保存。
【化学成分】本品为蒸馏法、离子交换法、反渗透法或其他适宜的方法制得的供药用的水,不含任何附加剂。
【分子式与分子量】H2O18.02
【药理作用】溶剂、稀释剂
这里药典纯化水标准中并无PH值项目,请问对纯化水有PH值的要求吗,范围应在多少?请说明出处?
在纯化水检测中,检验酸碱度合格,但是发现PH在8左右。如果按以上标准检验合格,是否要考虑PH值?请知道的解答,谢谢!


暂无品牌分类