Background
Using synthetic biology methods, the Escherichia coli K-12 genome was reduced by making a series of planned, precise deletions. The multiple-deletion series (MDS™) strains (1), with genome reduction of up to 15%, were designed by identifying non-essential genes and sequences for elimination, including recombinogenic or mobile DNA and cryptic virulence genes, while preserving robust growth and protein production. Genome reduction also led to unanticipated beneficial properties, including high electroporation efficiency and accurate propagation of recombinant genes and plasmids that are unstable in other strains. Subsequent deletions and introduction of useful alleles produce strains suitable for many molecular biology applications. Recently, Scarab has built on the MDS™42 foundation strain, by creating the MDS™42 Meta LowMut ΔrecA strain. It improves the already low mutation rate of the MDS™42 foundation strain. The MDS™42 Meta LowMut ΔrecA strain has been engineered to greatly reduce error-prone repair, which reduces the mutation rate to almost zero, even under the most stressful conditions, thus ensuring the most accurate replication of your plasmid. In addition, its metabolism has been optimized to enable ULTRA high density fermentation ~300 OD600 in minimal media at the 10 liter scale, which in turn enables ULTRA high biotherapeutic yields, protein or plasmid.
Figures
Figure 1. MDS™42 Meta LowMut ΔrecA has the Lowest Mutation Rate Under Stress. Mutation rates of various strains under unstressed and stressful conditions were determined. Stress conditions include overproduction of GFP, overproduction of a toxic peptide from pSG-ORF238 and treatment with mitomycin-C. All measurements were made using the cycA fluctuation assay, error bars represent 95% confidence intervals for the average of 3 independent measurements. BL21(DE3) failed to grow in the presence of 0.1 μg/ml mitomycin-C. ANOVA revealed a significance of p < 0.0001. Pairwise t-tests were conducted for each strain under a given condition compared to the corresponding MDS™42_lowmut strain.
Figure 2: Non-Expressing Plasmid Mutations Accumulate rapidly in BL21(DE3), When a Toxic Methyltransferase is Overproduced. SinI methyltransferase was expressed from pSin32. Plasmids were isolated at various intervals and screened (by transformation in McrBC+ and McrBC- hosts) for mutations resulting in loss of function of the enzyme. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals for the average of 3 independent measurements of mutant plasmid ratios. ANOVA revealed a significance of p < 0.005. Pairwise t-tests of each MDS™42_lowmut_mcrBC sample were done with the corresponding MDS™42 mcrBC and BL21(DE3) mcrBC sample, respectively. Starting from 10 hours, all MDS™42_lowmut_mcrBC samples differed significantly from the MDS™42 mcrBC (p < 0.01) or BL21(DE3) mcrBC (p < 0.005) samples.
Figure 3: Multiple Deletion Strains tolerate "deleterious” genes. A chimeric gene composed of VP60 of rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus fused to the B subunit of cholera toxin (CTX) was very unstable in E. coli. Individually, both genes were stable in E. coli HB101, C600 and DH10B, but pCTXVP60 carrying the fusion gene in the same hosts did not produce fusion protein and was recovered in low yields. All recovered plasmids contained mutations in the CTXVP60 open reading frame, virtually all resulting from IS insertions. In contrast, the recombinant plasmid was completely stable in MDS™; normal yields of plasmid DNA were obtained. Representative restriction patterns of pCTXVP60. (A) Plasmid DNA from MDS™42 was transformed and propagated in the indicated host, then digested with NcoI and EcoRI. A representative of each restriction pattern was purified and sequenced. M, molecular weight marker, 1 kbp ladder; 1, MDS™41, no insertion; 2, MDS™42, no insertion; 3, DH10B, IS10 insertion; 4, DH10B, IS10 insertion/deletion; 5, C600, IS5 insertion; 6, C600, IS1 insertion; 7, C600, IS1 insertion. (B) Relative position of the IS element insertion sites in the CTXVP60 reading frame determined for the five examples presented.
Figure 4: Plasmid stability in different host strains. Left: during four subcultures of pT-ITR, a plasmid with viral LTR segments; Lane 0, isolated plasmid DNA before subculture, lanes 1-4, successive subcultures. Plasmid DNA was digested with restriction enzymes and analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. KpnI cuts the plasmid at a single site, but in MG1655 two bands indicate a deletion in the plasmid. MscI cuts at two locations, but in MG1655 a third intermediate band confirms that the plasmid is deleted. Right: Stability of four variants of a Lentiviral expression plasmid in MDS™42 ΔrecA and Stbl3™ (Life Technologies), showing the proportion of transformants containing intact plasmids (Table 2 BioTechniques 43:466-470 (October 2007))(2).
Specifications
Kit Components MDS™42 Meta LowMut ΔrecA Electrocompetent Cells pUC19 Control DNA (10 pg/µl) SOC Medium Genotypes MG1655 multiple-deletion strain (1) relA* Δrph ΔarpA ΔiclR ilvG+ ΔdinB ΔpolB ΔumuDC (2) ΔrecA(1819). Quality Control Transformation efficiency is tested using pUC19 Control DNA, in duplicate. Transformed cells are plated onto LB plates containing 50 µg/ml carbenicillin. Transformation efficiency is > 5 x 109 cfu/µg DNA. Storage Conditions Store components at –80°C. Do not store cells in liquid nitrogen.
Related Products
White Glove IS Detection Kit
Support
Product Manuals MDS™42 Meta LowMut ΔrecA Electrocompetent Cell Kit Papers
- Pósfai G, et al., (2006) Emergent properties of reduced-genome Escherichia coli. Science 312:1044-6.
- Csörgő et al. (2012) Low-Mutation-Rate, Reduced-Genome Escherichia coli an Improved Host for Faithful Maintenance of Engineered Genetic Constructs Microbial Cell Factories, 11:11.
- Chacko S. Chakiath, CS & Esposito, D (2007): Improved recombinational stability of lentiviral expression vectors using reduced-genome Escherichia coli. BioTechniques 43:466-470.
Patents & Disclaimers
Products are sold for non-commercial use only, under Scarab Genomics limited use label license: Limited Label Use.Scarab is providing you with this Material subject to the non-transferable right to use the subject amount of the Material for your research at your academic institution. The Recipient agrees not to sell or otherwise transfer this Material, or anything derived or produced from the Material to a third party. NO RIGHTS ARE PROVIDED TO USE THE MATERIAL OR ANYTHING DERIVED OR PRODUCED FROM THE MATERIAL FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES. If the Recipient makes any changes to the chromosome of the Material that results in an invention in breach of this limited license, then Scarab will have a worldwide, exclusive, royalty-free license to such invention whether patentable or not. If the Recipient is not willing to accept the terms of this limited license, Scarab is willing to accept return of this product with a full refund, minus shipping and handling costs. For information on obtaining a license to this Material for purposes other than research, please contact Scarab’s Licensing Department. Scarab Genomics’ technology is covered by U.S. Pat. No. 6,989,265 and related foreign applications. Clean Genome® is a registered trademark of Scarab Genomics, LLC.
ebiomall.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
DXY721认为:
悬浮细胞和贴壁细胞在转染过程中差别不大,主要差别在于转染后的筛选,当然如果你做的是瞬时转染就不存在筛选的问题了。
其实转染的过程很简单,问题是能不能转的进去的,转染率能有多少,转进去是否可以稳定表达目的蛋白等等。
我们也是用脂质体做悬浮细胞的转染,说明书上都有具体的操作过程,将脂质体和目的基因按比例混合,然后加到细胞悬液里就OK了,说的简单,实际上还是有一些细节要注意的,比如脂质体和目的基因混合的比例,转染的细胞数,细胞的代数,细胞的状态,有的还要求在转染的前一天传代一次,不过不要怕,这些在脂质体说明书上都有明确的说明,按照说明书做就可以了。
jinghuanlv认为:
悬浮细胞和贴壁细胞转染还是有很大不同的。
脂质体转染的原理基于电荷吸引原理,先形成脂质体-DNA复合物,散布在细胞周围,然后通过细胞的内吞作用,将目的基因导入细胞内,而脂质体复合物与贴壁细胞的接触机会比悬浮细胞高出很多倍,所以,脂质体转染时悬浮细胞的转染效率要明显低于贴壁细胞。
我们实验室转染悬浮细胞是用的电穿孔法,目前为止,悬浮细胞转染的最好方法还是电转,我们实验室用的电转仪是Bio-Rad的,使用条件是电压250V,电容975uF,效果不错,不妨一用。
“转化”是指含外源基因的重组质粒(载体)将外源基因直接导入原核细胞(如细菌);
“转导”指通过重组病毒载体将外源基因导入真核细胞或原核细胞;
“转染”指重组质粒载体或游离核苷酸在脂质体等介导下进入真核细胞;
“感染”在基因转移实验中强调重组病毒载体入侵受体细胞的过程。
在使用这4 个名词时, 应仔细分析基因转移实验的四要素——转移物、载体、介导方法、受体细胞类型,而正确区 分载体和受体细胞类型是辨析的关键点。当载体是重组质粒时,如受体细胞是原核细胞应使 用“转化”,如受体细胞是真核细胞则使用“转染”;当载体是重组病毒时,如强调转移物进 入受体细胞应使用“转导”,如强调重组病毒载体进入受体细胞的过程则使用“感染”。
我刚开始做转染,悬浮细胞,分别做过表达和敲减,看了很多文献,大都没有提及转染后是用转染的这同一批细胞同时做pcr,wb,cck8,凋亡,细胞周期;还是说这次转染只做pcr或wb,再转染一次做cck8或细胞周期。剩下的功能试验均同前,转染一次做一次?我养的是悬浮细胞,转染后做cck8这些功能试验前需要离心换液吗?跪谢解答!
实验室一直都是用日常型质粒抽提试剂盒,转染细胞没问题。
我觉得只要是注意以下2点就可以了:
1,注意大肠杆菌(Escherichia coli)本身的污染,收集菌体沉淀时防止菌液散落,经常用75%的乙醇擦拭手套。
2,最后洗脱时最好使用无内毒素的水,我们是用注射用水的。
无论是小提还是大提我们都是用的日常型的,并没有刻意用转染级的,因为转染量大,去内毒素的操作太麻烦,损失太大。
本人研究生
悬浮细胞的转染方法:(以下内容转自生物帮资讯)
DXY721认为:
悬浮细胞和贴壁细胞在转染过程中差别不大,主要差别在于转染后的筛选,当然如果你做的是瞬时转染就不存在筛选的问题了。
其实转染的过程很简单,问题是能不能转的进去的,转染率能有多少,转进去是否可以稳定表达目的蛋白等等。
我们也是用脂质体做悬浮细胞的转染,说明书上都有具体的操作过程,将脂质体和目的基因按比例混合,然后加到细胞悬液里就OK了,说的简单,实际上还是有一些细节要注意的,比如脂质体和目的基因混合的比例,转染的细胞数,细胞的代数,细胞的状态,有的还要求在转染的前一天传代一次,不过不要怕,这些在脂质体说明书上都有明确的说明,按照说明书做就可以了。
jinghuanlv认为:
悬浮细胞和贴壁细胞转染还是有很大不同的。
脂质体转染的原理基于电荷吸引原理,先形成脂质体-DNA复合物,散布在细胞周围,然后通过细胞的内吞作用,将目的基因导入细胞内,而脂质体复合物与贴壁细胞的接触机会比悬浮细胞高出很多倍,所以,脂质体转染时悬浮细胞的转染效率要明显低于贴壁细胞。
我们实验室转染悬浮细胞是用的电穿孔法,目前为止,悬浮细胞转染的最好方法还是电转,我们实验室用的电转仪是Bio-Rad的,使用条件是电压250V,电容975uF,效果不错,不妨一用。
DXY721认为:
悬浮细胞和贴壁细胞在转染过程中差别不大,主要差别在于转染后的筛选,当然如果你做的是瞬时转染就不存在筛选的问题了。
其实转染的过程很简单,问题是能不能转的进去的,转染率能有多少,转进去是否可以稳定表达目的蛋白等等。
我们也是用脂质体做悬浮细胞的转染,说明书上都有具体的操作过程,将脂质体和目的基因按比例混合,然后加到细胞悬液里就OK了,说的简单,实际上还是有一些细节要注意的,比如脂质体和目的基因混合的比例,转染的细胞数,细胞的代数,细胞的状态,有的还要求在转染的前一天传代一次,不过不要怕,这些在脂质体说明书上都有明确的说明,按照说明书做就可以了。
jinghuanlv认为:
悬浮细胞和贴壁细胞转染还是有很大不同的。
脂质体转染的原理基于电荷吸引原理,先形成脂质体-DNA复合物,散布在细胞周围,然后通过细胞的内吞作用,将目的基因导入细胞内,而脂质体复合物与贴壁细胞的接触机会比悬浮细胞高出很多倍,所以,脂质体转染时悬浮细胞的转染效率要明显低于贴壁细胞。
我们实验室转染悬浮细胞是用的电穿孔法,目前为止,悬浮细胞转染的最好方法还是电转,我们实验室用的电转仪是Bio-Rad的,使用条件是电压250V,电容975uF,效果不错,不妨一用。

