![StressMarq/Anti-GABA A Receptor Beta 3 Antibody [S87-25]/SMC-339D-A594/100-µg](images/StressMarq/201710/SMC-339_GABA-A-Receptor-_Antibody_S87-25_IHC_mouse_Brain_1-150x150.png)
Overview:
Product Name | GABA A Receptor Beta 3 Antibody | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Description | Mouse Anti-Mouse GABA A Receptor Beta 3 Monoclonal IgG1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Species Reactivity | Human, Mouse, Rat | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Applications | WB, ICC/IF, AM | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Antibody Dilution | WB (1:1000), IHC (1:1000), ICC/IF (1:100); optimal dilutions for assays should be determined by the user. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Host Species | Mouse | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Immunogen Species | Mouse | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Immunogen | Fusion protein amino acids 370-433 of mouse GABA-A-R-Beta3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concentration | 1 mg/ml | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conjugates |
Alkaline Phosphatase, APC, ATTO 390, ATTO 488, ATTO 565, ATTO 594, ATTO 633, ATTO 655, ATTO 680, ATTO 700, Biotin, FITC, HRP, PE/ATTO 594, PerCP, RPE, Streptavidin, Unconjugated
StreptavidinProperties:
Streptavidin Datasheet BiotinProperties:
Biotin Datasheet HRP (Horseradish peroxidase)Properties:
HRP Datasheet AP (Alkaline Phosphatase)Properties:
AP Datasheet
|
Properties
Storage Buffer | PBS pH7.4, 50% glycerol, 0.09% sodium azide |
Storage Temperature | -20ºC |
Shipping Temperature | Blue Ice or 4ºC |
Purification | Protein G Purified |
Clonality | Monoclonal |
Clone Number | S87-25 |
Isotype | IgG1 |
Specificity | Detects ~55kDa. No cross-reactivity against GABA-A-R-Beta 2 or –Beta1. |
Cite This Product | StressMarq Biosciences Cat# SMC-339, RRID: AB_10610133 |
Certificate of Analysis | 1 µg/ml of SMC-339 was sufficient for detection of Beta3 GABA receptor in 10 µg of rat brain lysate by colorimetric immunoblot analysis using goat anti-mouse IgG:HRP as the secondary antibody. |
Biological Description
Alternative Names | ECA5 antibody, GABA alpha receptor beta-2 subunit antibody, GABA(A) receptor subunit beta-3 antibody, GABAA receptor beta 3 subunit antibody, GABAA receptor subunit beta 3 antibody, GABR B3 antibody, Gabrb3 antibody, Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) A receptor beta 3 antibody, Gamma aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta 3 antibody, Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor subunit beta-3 antibody, GBRB3_HUMAN antibody, MGC9051 antibody |
Research Areas | GABA Receptors, GABAA Receptors, Neuroscience, Neurotransmitter Receptors |
Cellular Localization | Cell Junction, Cell membrane, Postsynaptic cell membrane, Synapse |
Accession Number | NP_032097.1 |
Gene ID | 14402 |
Swiss Prot | P63080 |
Scientific Background | The GABA-A receptor is a member of the superfamily of fast acting ligand-gated ion channels. The individual subunits of these receptors have similar sequences and structural features (1). GABA-A receptors are the major fast inhibitory neurotransmitter gated ion channels in the brain (2). |
References |
1. Bracamontes J.R. and Steinbach J.H. (2008) J Bio Chem. 283: 26128-26136. 2. Macdonald R.L., Olsen R.W. (1993) Annu Rev Neurosci. 17: 569-602. |
Product Images

Immunohistochemistry analysis using Mouse Anti-GABA A Receptor Monoclonal Antibody, Clone S87-25 (SMC-339). Tissue: Brain. Species: mouse. Fixation: 10% Formalin Solution for 12-24 hours at RT. Primary Antibody: Mouse Anti-GABA A Receptor Monoclonal Antibody (SMC-339) at 1:1000 for 1 hour at RT. Secondary Antibody: HRP/DAB Detection System: Biotinylated Goat Anti-Mouse, Streptavidin Peroxidase, DAB Chromogen (brown) for 30 minutes at RT. Counterstain: Mayer Hematoxylin (purple/blue) nuclear stain at 250-500 µl for 5 minutes at RT.

Western Blot analysis of Rat brain membrane lysate showing detection of GABA A Receptor protein using Mouse Anti-GABA A Receptor Monoclonal Antibody, Clone S87-25 (SMC-339). Load: 15 µg protein. Block: 1.5% BSA for 30 minutes at RT. Primary Antibody: Mouse Anti-GABA A Receptor Monoclonal Antibody (SMC-339) at 1:1000 for 2 hours at RT. Secondary Antibody: Sheep Anti-Mouse IgG: HRP for 1 hour at RT.
Product Citations (2)
Other Citations
Biomarker Analysis with Grating Coupled Surface Plasmon Coupled Fluorescence.
Mendoza, A., Dias, J.A., Zeltner, T. and Lawrence, D.A. (2014) J Adv Bio & Biotech. 1(1): 1-22.
PubMed ID: N/A Reactivity Human Applications: Antibody Microarray
Biomarker Analysis with Grating Coupled Surface Plasmon Coupled Fluorescence.
Mendoza, A., Dias, J.A., Zeltner, T. and Lawrence, D.A. (2014) J Adv Bio & Biotech. 1(1): 1-22.
PubMed ID: N/A Reactivity Mouse Applications: Antibody Microarray
ATTO 594 | ||
Overview:
ATTO 594 Datasheet | ![]() | Optical Properties: λex = 601 nm λem = 627 nm εmax = 1.2×105 Φf = 0.85 τfl = 3.5 ns Brightness = 102 Laser = 594 nm Filter set = Texas Red® |
ebiomall.com






>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
是否可以理解为纯化水得PH范围为6.3-7.6?能否直接用pH计测量?谢谢!
因为是考察不同PH对药物的影响,样品又不好改变其PH值,这种情况怎么办?希望有经验的高手指教。
我的流动相是甲醇-水(90:10)
谢谢赐教!
请进子版按格式发贴,自行修改,谢谢。
常用流动相加酸碱后PH的总结,希望大家能够提供一点自己测过的结果,谢谢先
两个CEX方法A和B测定同一单抗,结果碱性峰比例差不多,酸性峰比例相差约7%,相应主峰也差了7%左右。
具体来说,A方法酸性峰高,主峰低,碱性峰稍微低点;B方法酸性峰低,主峰高,碱性峰稍微高点;另外也做了CIEF,结果呢和A方法更接近。
仔细比较起来,AB两个方法的峰性和数量差不多,就不知道为什么会有这么大的差异。两个方法一个用的WCX柱-磷酸缓冲液,一个用SCX柱-MES缓冲液
大家帮我分析下:
1.两个方法哪个方法更准确,是以酸性峰高的为准还是什么?为什么?
2.这显著差异是由方法造成,具体原因是什么?柱子?
3.CIEF的结果和A方法更接近,是不是可以由此证明A方法更好或者CIEF的方法更好(因为CIEF更快更方便)?
欢迎讨论~
纠正下,A方法用的是Tosoh的柱子,B方法用的是SCX柱。TOSOH的柱子是7um的填料,10cm长。SCX是10um的填料。我本人TOSOH的阳离子柱子用的很少,这次信手用用,结果发现差异很大
那我现在就考虑,在以后方法开发过程中,除了通过流动相pH和组成、梯度、柱子选择来获得样品主峰和酸碱性的最大分离,还要关注各峰比例。因为之前比较方法好坏都只看分离度,尤其是主峰和邻近峰的分离度,获得最大分离度,自然可以做到主峰尽可能纯,但从未认真比较过各峰比例。这是一个大疏忽吧!
另外,CIEF和CEX方法原理还是有点差异的,所以分的是不同的异质体,原液放行两个方法肯定是都要做的。问题就是在早期细胞株筛选和工艺开发阶段,哪个方法才是又快又准。CIEF(iCE280)一般15分钟一个样,比CEX快多了。如果CIEF测得主峰要低于CEX结果,是不是真的完全可以取代CEX呢?CEX分离出的峰远比CIEF的多!
欢迎大家继续讨论~
1、弱酸和它的盐(如:HAc---NaAc)的水溶液组成;
2、弱碱和它的盐(如:NH3·H2O---NH4Cl)的水溶液组成;
3、多元弱酸的酸式盐及其对应的次级盐(如:NaH2PO4---Na2HPO4)的水溶液组成。
酸碱缓冲溶液的选型一般应根据具体情况进行选择。缓冲酸性可选用碱性缓冲液,缓冲酸性可采用碱性缓冲液。常用作缓冲溶液的酸类由弱酸及其共轭酸盐组合成的溶液具有缓冲作用。生化实验室常用的缓冲系主要有磷酸、柠檬酸、碳酸、醋酸、巴比妥酸、Tris(三羟甲基氨基甲烷)等系统,生化实验或研究工作中要慎重地选择缓冲体系,因为有时影响实验结果的因素并不是缓冲液的pH值,而是缓冲液中的某种离子。如硼酸盐、柠檬酸盐、磷酸盐和三羟甲基甲烷等缓冲剂都可能产生不需要的化学反应。
【酸碱缓冲溶液】由弱酸及其盐、弱碱及其盐组成的混合溶液,能在一定程度上抵消、减轻外加强酸或强碱对溶液酸碱度的影响,从而保持溶液的pH值相对稳定。这种溶液称为酸碱缓冲溶液。
1.直接用固体磷酸钠配制成50mM的磷酸钠溶液,再调pH到7.4;(我们试着用这个做了下,发现挂不上柱)
2.配置磷酸钠盐缓冲液:按NaH2PO4:Na2HPO4以19:81的摩尔比配制成pH7.4的缓冲液?(附一张百度出来的配方
)
3.如果是磷酸钠盐缓冲液,可以直接将50mM的NaH2PO4的水溶液用NaOH调成pH7.4吗?
再者,2和3这两个方法配制的磷酸钠盐缓冲液有什么区别?最终效果是一样的吗?如果不一样,有什么理论的知识支撑呢?个人感觉是分析化学中酸碱理论中的缓冲液那里的知识。求帮忙解答这些疑问。
另外,我还想问一下,pH对于Ni柱对His-tagged的蛋白的分离纯化影响大吗?是怎么影响的?谢谢大家了!
由弱酸及其盐、弱碱及其盐组成的混合溶液,能在一定程度上抵消、减轻外加强酸或强碱对溶液酸碱度的影响,从而保持溶液的pH值相对稳定。这种溶液称为缓冲溶液。

